[Advaita-l] Shankara and DrishTi-SrishTi vAda - eka jeeva vaada

[Venkatraghavan S]

OK sir, no problem. Whatever you have been taught by your guru only is
correct.

Regards,
Venkatraghavan
On 12 May 2016 3:48 p.m., "Srirudra" <srirudra at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dears
> That there is no creation is not in tune with what the sruthi says.In
> Vishnu Sahasranamam the first word is Visvam.It means Brahman or the
> Supreme being.Its root visati means enter or interpenetrate.Taitreya
> Upanishad
> 2-6 readsTat srushtvaTad eva anupravisat-meaning Having projected the
> universe He entered into it.Again Yat prayaanty abhisamvisanti Taitreya 3-1
> -that unto which all beings enter at the time of dissolution.Thus Brahman
> Enters  into its effect and the universe enters or dissolves in Him.
> Thus the eka Jiiva vada is not agreeing with the sruthi vakyas.Again
> Vishnu means pervading every thing.So there is creation and it is created
> by Him.
> He just desired say the sruthi further to project the universe.So there is
> no creation is not just correct.It is not agreeing with the sruthi.
> R.Krishnamoorthy.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On 12-May-2016, at 4:38 PM, Venkatraghavan S via Advaita-l <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
> >
> > No, I am saying the hInatva adjective you add to jeeva is also your
> > adhyAropa, not mine. So if you think I am belittling vedA by making a
> hIna
> > jIva perform apparent srishti, that is because *you* are superimposing
> > hInatva, *not me*.
> >
> > In reality I hold no creation to have happened. However, even in avidyA
> > dasha, when we talk of apparent creation, hInatva of the jIva is only an
> > imagination, not fact.
> >
> > Regards
> > Venkatraghavan
> >> On 12 May 2016 11:47 a.m., "Bhaskar YR" <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sorry, I don't consider the jIva to be heena at all. He is sAkshAt
> Brahman.
> >>
> >> praNAms
> >>
> >> Hare Krishna
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Oh!! if you are saying this srushti is from sAkshAt parabrahMan I don’t
> >> have any issues but only agreements J
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
> >>
> >> bhaskar
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> *From:* Venkatraghavan S [mailto:agnimile at gmail.com]
> >> *Sent:* Thursday, May 12, 2016 3:33 PM
> >> *To:* Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com>
> >> *Cc:* A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <
> >> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>; Anand Hudli <
> anandhudli at hotmail.com>
> >> *Subject:* RE: [Advaita-l] Shankara and DrishTi-SrishTi vAda - eka jeeva
> >> vaada
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Sri Bhaskar,
> >>>
> >>>> parasmAccha brahmaNaH pANAdikaM jagat jAyate iti vedAntAmaryAda says
> >> bhAshyakAra in sUtra bhAshya.  Without giving any importance to
> >> bhAshyakAra's verdict,  if we say this jagat is parichinna, avidyA
> >> paripUrNa, heena jeeva's imagination, we are undoubtedly insulting &
> >> belittling the vedAnta maryAda.
> >>
> >> Sorry, I don't consider the jIva to be heena at all. He is sAkshAt
> Brahman.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Venkatraghavan
> >>>
> >>> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
> >>> bhaskar
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> > http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> >
> > To unsubscribe or change your options:
> > http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> >
> > For assistance, contact:
> > listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>