[Advaita-l] Shankara and DrishTi-SrishTi vAda - eka jeeva vaada

[श्रीमल्ललितालालितः]

I don't know what you know about dRRiShTisRRiShTi, but if you think that
'everything' is sRRiShTa then you need some more time to look at old books
and similarly more time to use inference and imagination too.
Even in ekajIva-dRRiShTisRRiShTi anAdi-s are not sRRiShTa. And jIva is one
of the anAdi-s. People appreciate if someone presents some old sentence, so
here it is from advaitasiddhikAra - अनाद्यतिरिक्तसृष्टिविषय एव
दृष्टिसृष्टिस्वीकारात् ।
Why ekajIvavAdin-s don't accept jIva and support jIvAbhAsa is totally
another thing. And, similarly the acceptance of nAnAjIva has nothing to do
with dRRiShTisRRiShTi or sRRiShTidRRiShTi.


*श्रीमल्ललितालालितः*www.lalitaalaalitah.com

On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Venkatraghavan S <agnimile at gmail.com>
wrote:

> So definition of srishti in drishti srishti is limited to prapancha but
> not other jIvAs? This would mean that not everything drishta is srishta.
>
> How else to preserve drishti srishti and nAna jIvAs?
>
> Regards,
> Venkatraghavan
> On 13 May 2016 7:44 a.m., "श्रीमल्ललितालालितः" <
> lalitaalaalitah at lalitaalaalitah.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 13-May-2016 12:10 pm, "Venkatraghavan S" <agnimile at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > To each jIva, appearance of other jivAs is also part of his srishta
>> prapanchA? He may not think they are his srishti though.
>>
>> if that was the case then what is the use of accepting nAnA jIva? and,
>> how is it going to be nAnAjIvavAda?
>>
>