[Advaita-l] Without Shakti, Brahman has no role

[Venkatraghavan S]

Namaste Sri Srinivasamurthy,
There you go, न चेदेवं देवो न खलु कुशलः स्पन्दितुमपि is echoed in the
upaniShad itself.

Regards,
Venkattaghavan

On 5 Jun 2017 8:04 a.m., "sreenivasa murthy" <narayana145 at yahoo.co.in>
wrote:

Dear Sri Venkataraghavan,
   I am grateful to you for your response.
Mantra 5 of *ISAvAsya* Upanishad reds thus :
        tadEjati tannaijati
           taddUrE tadvantikE |
        tadantarasya sarvasya
           tadu sarvasyAsya bAhyataH ||

     Please see and understand the the significance and true meaning of the
line " tadEjati tannaijati ||"
Sri Shankara, in his commentary to the above mantra, writes :
      tat AtmatattvaM yat prakRutam Ejati calati; tadEva ca naijati svatO
naiva calati |
      svatO^calamEva sat calatIvEtyarthaH ||

It is this truth that a student of Vedanta has to cognize within himself by
himself. Thus taught my Revered Guru.

I do not know whether you have understood correctly the spirit in which the
question was put by me. It is never my intention to judge or pass comments
on the understanding  of oter honourable members. If I have hurt their
feelings I tender my apologies to all. I have the greatest respect for the
scholarship of the members.

 With respectful namaskars,
      Sreenivasa Murthy.




------------------------------
*From:* Venkatraghavan S <agnimile at gmail.com>
*To:* A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <advaita-l at lists.advaita-
vedanta.org>; sreenivasa murthy <narayana145 at yahoo.co.in>
*Cc:* Venkatesh Murthy <vmurthy36 at gmail.com>
*Sent:* Sunday, 4 June 2017 3:50 PM

*Subject:* Re: [Advaita-l] Without Shakti, Brahman has no role

Namaste Sri Srinivasa Murthy,
You said:
"The works which you have mentioned in your reply is of very little
interest to me ."
If that is the case, why are you interested to know if the position
outlined in Soundarya Lahiri is consistent with Chandogya upaniShad? The
ideas in the first verse of that work is the subject matter of this thread,
and that work is, in your words, of no interest to you.

If you have been spending most of your time telling others what they have
been doing is useless and of no interest to you, please do not expect them
to reply to you the next time you question them about what they are doing.
They will assume the question is only rhetorical.

Regards,
Venkatraghavan






______________________________ _________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta. org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane. culture.religion.advaita

To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta. org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org



______________________________ _________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta. org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane. culture.religion.advaita

To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta. org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org




--
Regards -Venkatesh


______________________________ _________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta. org/archives/advaita-l/
<http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/>
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane. culture.religion.advaita
<http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita>

To unsubscribe or change your options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta. org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
<http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l>

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org