[Advaita-l] Quantum Physics came from Vedas: Schrödinger and Einstein read Veda's

[R Krishnamoorthy]

Dears
This shows that we were ahead of modern theories on how the universe
functions.Einstein found corrections were required for Newton's laws.He
enunciated General theory of relativity concernig the motions of moving
objects of uniform motion.This solved or explained about properties of
light and how universal gravitational force bends light rays which were
thought to be on straight lines only till then.Quantum physics tried to
explain how light made of photons behaves when getting reflected or passing
through perforated holes.Our vedic scholars have thought over these things
but did not pursue them .Their goal was what is Brahman and what is
universe.So belittling their theories that they could not put to use etc is
just whimsical.We knew these things much much earlier is what makes us
proud.Our goals were for knowing what is this universe and how it came into
being.Advaita says that all this are just super imposition on Brahman and
this super imposition is a mythya.R.Krishnamoorthy.

On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 5:18 PM, D.V.N.Sarma డి.వి.ఎన్.శర్మ via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

> I want to show how incompatible and absurd some of the claims that are made
> by our people.
>
> First of all Kanada was not the only man who proposed atoms in the ancient
> world.
> Greek philosopher Lucretius also proposed atomic nature of matter in his
> book "Of the Nature of Things".
>
> According to Vaiseshika aNu the atom(supposed to be the smallest part of
> matter and indivisible) combines
> with another aNu to form DvyaNuka(diatom). Three Dvyanukas combine to form
> a TrasareNu. Vaiseshikas thought
> that these TrasareNus are the ones that are seen as shining entities
> floating in a sun beam.
>
> The approximate size of these aerosol particles are about say 10 microns or
> 0.00001 m.
>
> The modern science talks about atoms whose size is 0.0000000001 m.
>
> That means in a trasareNu there will be about 100000 atoms of modern
> science.
> In addition atoms modern science can be further devided.
>
> Thus there is absolutely no correspondance between the atoms of modern
> science and aNus of Kanada or Lucretius.
>
> regards,
> Sarma.
>
> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 4:41 PM, V Subrahmanian via Advaita-l <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 3:46 PM, D.V.N.Sarma డి.వి.ఎన్.శర్మ via Advaita-l
> <
> > advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
> >
> > > I want to humbly inform the list members that I have taught PG students
> > of
> > > Physics in a University for 13 years and I taught
> > > Quantum Mechanics also. So your quotations do not in any way affect my
> > > simple question.
> > >
> > > Why these people with all their anushThana and swadhyaya of vedas who
> > claim
> > > Vedic origin of modern science
> > >
> >
> > Dear Sri Sarma,
> >
> > The scientist's account found in the cited book does not *claim* what you
> > state above. On the other hand it only says that the method of the
> > evolution of scientific theory has some striking similarities with the
> way
> > the Indian philosophical thought has.
> >
> > // If the physical accompaniments such as the senses, apparatus etc., are
> > included in the notion of the observer, then, since they interact with
> the
> > observed, the so-called observer would correspond to the *pramātṛ* or the
> > *kartṛ*, while, if the ‘de-personalisation’ as is now-a-days envisaged,
> is
> > effected by stripping of these, the observer would then correspond to the
> > Witness – *Sākṣī* of Vedanta.  These theories have forced the view that
> the
> > universe can, at best, if at all, be ‘described’ succinctly, and never
> > ‘accounted for’.  There is thus the admission of Avidyā of the
> investigator
> > and anirvachanīyatā of the universe, as in Vedanta.  That the universe
> has
> > been referred to by them (the scientists) as mysterious, recalls to the
> > mind the Māyā of Vedanta.//
> >
> > regards
> > vs
> >
> >
> > > themselves could not do what westerners did?
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > Sarma.
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> > http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> >
> > To unsubscribe or change your options:
> > http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> >
> > For assistance, contact:
> > listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>