[Advaita-l] A fine summary of Advaita doctrine

[V Subrahmanian]

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:03 PM, H S Chandramouli <hschandramouli at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 11:45 PM, V Subrahmanian via Advaita-l <
>> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> << In all bhrama-s the two adhyāsa-s are admitted >>,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> And  << That is why in the jivanmukti state, the artha, the world,
>> continues to appear but the mithyātva nishchaya is also present >>,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The two appear to be contradictory. As per the above itself, arthAdhyAsa
>> continues for a jnani while jnAnAdhyAsa is absent.
>>
>
It is actually bādhitasya arthasya anuvṛttiḥ and hence no contradiction.

>
>>
>>
>>
>> Reg  << Whereas in the kārya adhyāsa, which is vyāvahārika, ajnātasattā
>> is admitted,>>,
>>
>>
>>
>> With reference to  ajnātasattā, both kArya (pot/ornament) and kArana
>> (clay/gold) are adhyAsa. Where kArana (clay/gold ) is admitted to be satya
>> (vyAvahArika satya), there kArya (pot/ornament) is also admitted to be
>> satya (vyAvahArika satya) as in << mruttiketyeva satyam >>.  There is no
>> case where kArana (clay/gold) is admitted to be satya while kArya
>> (pot/ornament) is adhyAsa. That is the point being made.
>>
> Here, the context of the analogy is that the taking the kārya to be real.
This is what is stated to be wrong and the correction given out: the cause
alone is real and the effect unreal.

>
>>
>>
>>