[Advaita-l] The Glory of Sannyasa

[Sujal Upadhyay]

Pranams Sri Bhaskar Prabhu ji,


Well I do not have an answer to this, as I too consider words of veda as
eternal and so cannot be changed. Viṣṇu cannot be replaced by hari, though
both are same.

Vibrations produced are not the same and so they may interact with nāḍī-s
and chakra-s in a different way.

Thank you Sri Subbu ji for explanation.


OM

Sujal


On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 4:43 PM, Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:

> I completely agree. There are teachings by rishi-s, hymns written in their
> name, but they have received the eternal truth by intuitions or as a sprak
> in their heart. They are just revealing the eternal truth, sometimes
> directly, sometimes by giving examples.
>
>
>
> praNAms Sri Sujal prabhuji
>
> Hare Krishna
>
>
>
> Yes, hence they have been called as mantra drashtA-s not mantra karta-s.
> But question is whether the words (pada) formulated and composed  by
> rishi-s in veda-s after realizing the eternal truth ?  if the answer is
> yes, then paramArtha satya has been worded by rishi-s in various formats
> and given it to us in the form of veda/vedAnta-s.  Again, this is not
> agreeable since not only satya embedded in vedAnta is eternal and
> apaurusheya, each and every word in veda / vedAnta which has been there in
> the scripture is eternal and aparusheya.  Hence nobody dared to change the
> words in veda/vedAnta even though better clarity available in flourished
> language to convey the ‘SAME’ meaning.  So, pada and artha both are eternal
> and apaurusheyam when it comes to veda-s.
>
>
>
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
>
> bhaskar
>
>
>