[Advaita-l] Accounting for Brahman appearing as the world

[H S Chandramouli]

Namaste Praveeen Ji,

Just saw your last response. My post covering Naishkarmya Siddhi was posted
prior to my seeing your last post. I am entirely in agreement about
aikya-sAmAnAdhikaraNyam.
I was only responding to other queries about applicability of
bAdhasAmAnAdhikaraNyam
also.

Regards

<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

On Sun, Sep 10, 2017 at 7:53 PM, H S Chandramouli <hschandramouli at gmail.com>
wrote:

> ​Namaste Praveen Ji,
>>
>
>
>
>> Naishkarmya Siddhi, Chapter 2,  Verse 29
>>
>>
>>
>> << कथं  वाक्यं  तद्व्यपनेतृ  तत्  इति ?  उच्यते -
>>
>>
>>
>> <<  योयंस्थाणुः पुमानेषः पंधिया  स्थाणुधीरिव  ।  ब्रह्मास्मीति
>> धियाशेषाह्यहंबुद्धिर्निवर्त्यते  ॥  >>
>>
>>
>>
>> <<  kathaM  vAkyaM  tadvyapanetRRi  tat  iti ?  uchyate -
>>
>>
>>
>> << yoyaMsthANuH pumAneShaH paMdhiyA  sthANudhIriva  |  brahmAsmIti
>> dhiyAsheShAhyahaMbuddhirnivartyate  ||  >>,
>>
>>
>>
>> Translation (gist ) ( Based on translation by Sri SSS ).
>>
>>
>>
>> << If it is asked “ how that vAkya is negation ( of aham budhi ) “,  we
>> say-
>>
>>
>>
>> <<  The way the understanding of the nature “ this stalk of a tree is a
>> man only “ by a person completely negates the idea of the tree stalk, the
>> understanding  “I am Brahman “ completely negates the idea of “ I “( aham )
>> ( in anAtma, anything else ) >>.
>>
>>
>>
>> This is bAdhAyAM  sAmAnAdhikaraNyaM ( as per Sri SSS ).
>>
>>
>> Regards​
>>
>>
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free.
> www.avast.com
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> <#m_167515341102414115_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>