[Advaita-l] Question on adhyaasa

[H S Chandramouli]

Pranams Sri Sadananda Ji,

Reg  << Viveka perhaps to separate cognitively the two and keep them
separated unless needed for vyavahaara. >>,

Perhaps just a moot point. Viveka could only be a part of the sadhana to
reach the Goal which is jnAna.  Cannot  offer any views on the rest as it
is unclear to me. But may not be of any importance in the current context.
Regards

On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 8:26 PM kuntimaddi sadananda <
kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Chandramouliji and Venkatraghavanji, PraNAms
>
> Thanks for the clarification of the anyonya adhyaasa.
>
> As I understand from these posts:
>
> In essence, Kutastha remains unaffected while 'I am' part is coming from
> it and 'this' part is coming from enlivened MI. The mixture is the jiiva
> with one leg on I am and the other leg on this and therefore gets confused.
> Viveka perhaps to separate cognitively the two and keep them separated
> unless needed for vyavahaara.  The knower in the triad may be still this
> mixture while the Knower in the aham brahmaasmi is the leaving the 'this'
> part and claiming the I am part as full and complete.
>
> Appreciate any corrections.
>
> Hari Om!
> Sadananda
>
>
>
>
> On Monday, December 3, 2018, 7:12:37 PM GMT+5:30, H S Chandramouli via
> Advaita-l <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>
>
> Pranams Sri Sadananda Ji,
>
> The following might also be helpful in understanding the Panchadashi verse
> under reference.
>
> While analyzing the mahAvAkya “ tatvamasi “, two possibilities are
> considered for understanding the meaning of “ tvam “. One extends upto
> chidAbhAsa ( RC ) while the second extends upto kUtastha ( OC ). When
> chidAbhAsa ( RC ) is considered as the meaning of “ tvam “, the
> sAmAnAdhikaranya relevant is bAdhasAmAnAdhikaranya. When the meaning of “
> tvam “ is considered to be kUtastha ( OC ), the sAmAnAdhikaranya relevant
> is mukhyasAmAnAdhikaranya. In the Panchadashi verse under reference, it is
> the latter which is considered while stating “ anyOnyadhyAsa “.
>
> Hope this will be of some help in understanding the Panchadashi verse.
>
>
> Pranams and Regards
>
> >
> >>>
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>