[Advaita-l] 'iti' in the vAcArambhaNa shruti

[Anand Hudli]

<< vikAro nAmadheyam, kAraNam ityeva satyam corresponds to the second
> definition of mithyAtva.>>.

Shri Venkatraghavanji,

That is interesting. In that case, this vAkya must have the same gist as
the shruti vAkya  "neha-nAnAsti kiMchana" as BrahmAnanda says in his
gauDabrahmAnandI on the second definition, "neha nAnAstI"tyAdishrutyarthe
vivadamAnaM prati sAdhyAntaramAha". And yes, the neha nAnAsti shruti does
explain the realization that transformation of clay into pots, etc. does
not introduce diverse realities; rather the underlying reality clay is One.

Anand