[Advaita-l] Sleep, tamas and brahman
Praveen R. Bhat
bhatpraveen at gmail.com
Thu May 3 04:37:05 EDT 2018
This is beyond ridiculous an argument, if at all that! Your quotation of
the bhAShya itself was responded to by me with TIkA on that very bhAShya
that you have misunderstood! And if you keep asserting that that is what
the Upanishad and the bhAShya says and you've not misunderstood, then you
need to be kind enough to explain to us as to for what reason is your
interpretation of the Upanishad and bhAShya "superior" to the TIkAkAra's!
And further, if that is your conclusion, how is anyone's explanation here
going to help you see otherwise?! In which case, I do not know the
intention behind your original question/post in the first place.
That said, best wishes.
--Praveen R. Bhat
/* येनेदं सर्वं विजानाति, तं केन विजानीयात्। Through what should one know
That owing to which all this is known! [Br.Up. 4.5.15] */
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 1:55 PM Kalyan <kalyan_kg at yahoo.com> wrote:
> If my quotation of bhAshya has been ignored intentionally or otherwise,
> why should your quotation deserve consideration?
> On Thursday, May 3, 2018, 1:46:57 PM GMT+5:30, Praveen R. Bhat <
> bhatpraveen at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 1:34 PM Kalyan via Advaita-l <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
> The question is not about whether the BU 4.3 talks of one state, 2 states,
> 3 states or 4 states.
> The issue is whether deep sleep is treated as the highest (free from
> ignorance). The answer is an emphatic yes. This is not my opinion. This is
> opinion of upanishad and Shankara.
> Not at all. I've, among others, also quoted TIkA to prove the opposite,
> which has also been ignored, be it unintentionally!
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list