[Advaita-l] Partlessness of Brahman and Maya

[Venkatraghavan S]

Namaste sir,

pUrva mImAmsa is a philosophical system developed in ancient India for the
interpretation of vedic sentences, systematized in sUtra form by jaimini
maharishi.
nyAya is another Indian philosophical system which played a very important
role in the development of logic and epistemology, systematized by gautama
maharishi. Both mImAmsa and nyAya are one of the six Astika darSana-s of
India.

What I had said was that both philosophical systems accept the existence of
the Atma and that it has attributes (guNa-s).

Regards,
Venkatraghavan

On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 11:43 AM KAMESWARARAO MULA via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

>  however I have not come across references within pUrva mImAmsa
> or nyAya literature for the term nirguNa. The Atma, in both nyAya and
> mImAmsa, is saguNa
>
> Dear Sir,
>  Although my queries are not related to this thread,
>  In the earlier Discussion this point was raised "within pUrva mImAmsa
> or nyAya literature". Can learned explain what is the difference between
> mimamsa & Nyaya? Whether can we reach nyaya without mimamsa? how can nyaya
> belongs to Atma?
>
> I am keen to know could it be possible that Nyaya exists without
> subjective evidence. pl explain
>
> regards
> Kameswara
>      On Friday, 21 June, 2019, 3:45:01 PM IST, Bhaskar YR via Advaita-l <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>
>  gauDapAda in his *sAnkhya kArikA bhAShya*, uses the term "*aguNa*" for
> the puruSha, but the meaning is the same as the term nirguNa, ie one where
> the triguNa-s are absent. Now, it is not certain whether the author of this
> bhAShya is the same gauDapAda as the author of the mANDUkya kArika-s.
>
> praNAms Sri Venkatraghavan prabhuji
> Hare Krishna
>
> Just a curious question at the risk of digression from the main topic
> being discussed here.  Is this sAnkhya kArika bhAshya written by  Acharya
> (Sri gaudapAda (??) from Advaita sampradaya?? Is yes, as we know, pradhAna
> malla sAnkhya is  most of the times pUrvapaxi to Advaita. (paramataM
> apratishiddham anumatam bhavati...but quite a rare occasion is it not??)
> If the bhAshya is written to this kArika by some Advaita sampradaya
> Acharya  then it must be with one of the following agendas : To defend and
> explain the kArika-s in line with sAnkhya school of thought or refute it
> from vedAnta perspective or trying to explain the sAnkhya theory in line
> with vedAnta.  What was  the intention of sAnkhya kArika bhAshya author
> here??  Since I am not familiar with this work, asking this query.
>
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
> bhaskar
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>