[Advaita-l] No Parinama in Brahman says Shankara Bhagavatpada

[Venkatraghavan S]

Bhaskar ji
These explanations are only made because there are questions asking to
explain vyavahAra. An erroneous notion of existence presupposes all of
them. Take that away, there is neither change, nor entities whose existence
is based on that change.

That is why my first answer in this topic a few days back was, why do you
think something is going on?

Regards
Venkatraghavan

On Fri, 28 Jun 2019, 07:01 Bhaskar YR, <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:

> The problem of change is only possible in vyavahAra. When there is no
> vyavahAra in paramArtha what is the need to explain change there?
>
> praNAms Sri Venktraghavan prabhuji
> Hare Krishna
>
> Problem does not stop there with this solution (atleast from Sri
> Sudhanshu's perspective / doubt).  What is vyavahAra when there is
> absolutely one without second unchanging entity is there??  Is his next
> question.  The root of all these explanations he is doubting and clarifying
> is that these words jugglery like vyavahAra - paramArtha, jeeva, jagat,
> paramAtma etc. etc. are based on change lest these explanations /
> justification do not arise at all.
>
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
> bhaskar
>
>
>