[Advaita-l] A short explanation on 'adhanDAkAra vRtti' by Sri Mani Dravid Sastrinah

[Sudhanshu Shekhar]

Bhakar ji,

sAkShI needs something other than itself of which it can be a sAkShI. What
is there which is non-Brahman of which Brahman can be a sAkShI? So Brahman
can never be sAkShI. But that which is sAkShI i.e. kshetrajna/pratyagAtmA
is not different from Brahman. Brahman is the swaroopa of sAkShI.

If you impute sAkShitva to Brahman, then the anantatva of Brahman will be
contradicted.

Sudhanshu.

On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 12:01 PM Bhaskar YR <bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com> wrote:

> The swarUpa of kshetrajna is not sAkshi. SwarUpa of kshetrajna is Brahman.
>
>
>
> praNAms
>
> Hare Krishna
>
>
>
> Very interesting.  So that brahman  which has been described in
> shvetAshvatara as sAkshi cheetah, sarva bhUtAntarAtma, kevala nirguNa  is
> not the svarUpa of kshetrajna. Please explain in detail.  In short are you
> trying to say sAkshi is not brahman and kshetrajna svarUpa in brahman and
> not sAkshi??
>
>
>
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
>
> bhaskar
>


-- 
Joint Commissioner of Income-tax,
Pune

sudhanshushekhar.wordpress.com