[Advaita-l] Brihad Aranyaka 1.5.23

[H S Chandramouli]

Namaste.

I can only try to some extent.

Reg  << If we were to say that it is an adhidaivata sun which is talked
about, then
is it true that Surya merges with Vayu devata in *evening *and during
*sunset?
*This should not be so for He is available for other people of same earth.

If it is neither physical sun which merges in VAyu nor Surya devatA, then
how exactly should we understand the reference of merger of sun in vAyu in
evening during sunset >>,

The sun may be available for other people of same earth. But for a whole
lot of people, as well as the animal and plant kingdom, EFFECTIVELY sun is
absent. All of our activities are in a general sense basically determined
by  day and night caused by the presence or absence of sun as far as we are
concerned. That is what is meant by the Upanishad. However vAyu (in the
adhidaivata realm) is NEVER absent. This is akin to indriyAs being active
or inactive on a daily basis but prANa is never so (in the adhyAtma realm).
The upAsaka is advised to undertake upAsana identifying himself with prANa
dEvata at adyAtma level and vAyu dEvata at the adhidaivika level.
Regards

On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:22 PM Sudhanshu Shekhar <sudhanshu.iitk at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hari Om,
>
> I had gone through the Vartika and Tika before posting the question. I did
> not find answer to my question. Hence the post.
>
> Regards.
> Sudhanshu.
>
> On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 12:01 PM H S Chandramouli <
> hschandramouli at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Namaste Sudhanshu Ji,
>>
>> Reg  << In this regard, please share your views on 1.5.23 >>,
>>
>> The vArtika of Sri Swami Sureswaracharya covers the BU mantra 1-5-23. You
>> may like to refer to BUBV verses 1-5-376 to 390. The tIka of Sri Anandagiri
>> Acharya also, both on the Bhashya as well as on the relevant vArtika
>> portion, may be referred. In fact I think it directly addresses the
>> question raised by you.
>> Regards
>>
>> On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 2:41 PM Sudhanshu Shekhar via Advaita-l <
>> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hari Om,
>>>
>>> It is a well-known rule that if there is a prima facie contradiction
>>> between Shruti and pratyaksha, then it is to be inferred that Shruti
>>> intends to say something else.
>>>
>>> In this connection, I was struggling with the intended meaning of Brihad
>>> Aranyak Shruti 1.5.23. It states that sun goes to VAyu in evening during
>>> sunset. In Adhyatma, the chakShu (counterpart of sun) goes to PrAna
>>> (counterpart of VAyu).
>>>
>>> The topic is for upAsanA of PrAna.
>>>
>>> However, the merger of chakShu in PrAna is an empirical fact whereas
>>> merger
>>> of sun in VAyu is not an objective fact. Nothing happens to sun in
>>> evening.
>>> It remains where it is and where it was. Sunrise and sunset are said with
>>> respect to earth and are to be understood in a secondary sense.
>>>
>>> How to resolve this contradiction?
>>>
>>> If we were to say that it is an adhidaivata sun which is talked about,
>>> then
>>> is it true that Surya merges with Vayu devata in *evening *and during
>>> *sunset?
>>> *This should not be so for He is available for other people of same
>>> earth.
>>>
>>> If it is neither physical sun which merges in VAyu nor Surya devatA, then
>>> how exactly should we understand the reference of merger of sun in vAyu
>>> in
>>> evening during sunset.
>>>
>>> If we were to hold that the statement can make sense for the purposes of
>>> upAsana, then my question is whether we can do the upAsana with a
>>> factually
>>> wrong statement. Will we get requisite shraddhA. The upAsanA should also
>>> be
>>> logical. For e.g. in Brahma Sutra BhAShya, BhagvAn BhAShyakAra says that
>>> there is nothing illogical in worshipping omnipresent at a particular
>>> localized place but the vice versa cannot be proper.  अत्रोच्यते —
>>> नायंदोषः
>>> न तावत्परिच्छिन्नदेशस्य सर्वगतत्वव्यपदेशःकथमप्युपपद्यते सर्वगतस्य तु
>>> सर्वदेशेषुविद्यमानत्वात्परिच्छिन्नदेशव्यपदेशोऽपि कयाचिदपेक्षया सम्भवति.
>>> (1.2.7)
>>>
>>> Thus, it appears that upAsanA cannot be recommended by way of factually
>>> wrong statement. It can be, however, recommended through statements
>>> having
>>> figurative usage.
>>>
>>> In this regard, please share your views on 1.5.23.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Sudhanshu.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Joint Commissioner of Income-tax,
>>> Pune
>>>
>>> sudhanshushekhar.wordpress.com
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>>> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe or change your options:
>>> https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>>>
>>> For assistance, contact:
>>> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Joint Commissioner of Income-tax,
> Pune
>
> sudhanshushekhar.wordpress.com
>