[Advaita-l] Fwd: {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} couple of questions regarding "bramha satyam jagan-mithya"

[H S Chandramouli]

Namaste.

On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 3:27 PM V Subrahmanian <v.subrahmanian at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> <<  Here, I think there is no error, for even jagat satyatva vaadins
> agree that   the Jagat is not nitya since Brahman alone is nitya as
> admitted by them. Also it is not asat like gagana kusuma.  So, even if they
> do not use this term  ' sad-asad-vilakṣaṇam' they agree with what is stated
> here.>>
>

Brahman is not admitted in so many darshanas like
nyAya/vaisheshika/sAmkhya/Mimamsa etc. Then what is meant by the above
statement.

Regards

>
>
>
>
>>
>>>>
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>