[Advaita-l] Was Shankaracharya a Vaishnava??
v.subrahmanian at gmail.com
Sun Jun 14 11:26:10 EDT 2020
On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 2:30 PM Venkatraghavan S via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
> Namaste Raghav ji,
> "So the word nArAyaNa used by Shri Shankara shows that he is not a
> I suppose it depends on what the word vaiShNava means.
> If it means someone who believes that Brahman has form, we too are
> vaishNavas for we too agree that Brahman takes on the form that is dear to
> the upAsaka to bless him.
> However, we don't stop there. We say that all that exists is that viShNu
> alone. Therefore, anything that appears to be different from Him, we hold
> not to be real. The appearance of difference is merely that, an appearance.
> When we, who say that all that exists is that mahAviShNu, how can we be
> termed a-vaiShNava?
यान्ति देवव्रता देवान्पितॄन्यान्ति पितृव्रताः ।
भूतानि यान्ति भूतेज्या यान्ति मद्याजिनोऽपि माम् ॥ २५ ॥
In this bhashya: यान्ति मद्याजिनः मद्यजनशीलाः वैष्णवाः मामेव यान्ति ।
Some non-advaitins show this bhashyam and question: Look Shankara has
accepted that 'Vaishnava-s' are the ones that attain the Supreme, even
though the shloka does not use that term.
To this I reply: the Vaishnava-s that Shankara is meaning are not the ones
that you mean: For Shankara 'attaining to the Lord' is Brahma atma aikya
jnanam and not going to that loka and residing with the formed Bhagavan.
> Who is anyone to say we are not one with Ishvara?
As you say, the Advaitic 'Vaishnava' is non-different from Vishnu, the
Vyaapana shiila, and not an entity that has a form by default and someone
who is ever different from everything else in creation. So, the concept of
vastu pariccheda raahityam is also embedded in Shankara's idea of
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list