[Advaita-l] Commentary on Ramana's Forty Verses

[KAMESWARARAO MULA]

 Dear Memebers,
 Ramana Maharshi and Paramhamsa Ramakrishna are unique to themselves and they never bother about their physical bodies. Ramakirshna mentions in his final stages of caner in the throat, He refuses the doctors call and he says let the body go, I am not that and these sufferings are due to my remaining balance of the karmic debts of the all my previous births.

one MUST take to monkhood and give up the householder life

No: Monkhood is not a easy task as people generally thinks and it is the toughest path. One in 1Lakh people will get success where is householder job is much simpler if you understand the Dharma-ardha-kama-moksha concept throghly and performing all the duties so that samsara can be escaped after your (actions/karmic debts) are completed 

In the BG Krishna clearly says over and over again that non-action is not
the same as the way of monkhood. Arjuna and Janaka are just two examples of
non-monk jnanis.

Yes, Arjuna is Jnani and his darkness of thoughts were completely removed after the ceremony of Gita. Where as the 'JANAKA' is the Brahmman, who is the administrative kingdom of the Mithila and he mentions the same to 'Suka' that by performing all the the duties as a king, he is not attached to anything. 

The dialogue between ‘Nara’, Arjun, and ‘Narayan’, Krishn, became the Gita. Krishn preached that everything is predestined and we all should follow the path of our own karma, fixed action; Gita, 2:38, 47. Our lives are like a yajna and our karmas, actions, are the ‘ahuti’, offering. The Gita is actually Krishn’s dialogue with all of us.

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/toi-edit-page/invoke-krishn-when-faced-with-a-crisis/

Sri Guru Padaravindarpana Mastu
Kameswara     On Thursday, 17 June, 2021, 07:35:16 am IST, Akilesh Ayyar via Advaita-l <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:  
 
 Show me where in his written works it is said that one MUST take to
monkhood and give up the householder life. Not once does he say that.

His talks, as you well know, all contradict that idea, and so do the spirit
of his words.

The burden is on you to show why he didn’t say it was a must if it is so
important. Why didn’t he say, as Sankara clearly does in his texts to his
Brahmin disciples, “you MUST give up the householder life”?

If we are taking Ramana’s words “LITERALLY,” and jnanis are “literally”
dead to the world, then, again, why do jnanis eat?

Again, verbal gymnastics will not save you from an inadequate
understanding. Literalness yields nonsense in nonduality.

In the BG Krishna clearly says over and over again that non-action is not
the same as the way of monkhood. Arjuna and Janaka are just two examples of
non-monk jnanis.

On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 6:25 PM Ven Balakrishnan <ventzu at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

> It is a source of amusement to see so-many self-proclaimed jnanis
> passionately emphasise that renunciation, utter desirelessness is not a
> concomitant of jnana.  I wonder why that could be?
>
> And the verbal acrobatics to justify this position, arguing a phrase here
> is figurative, whereas a phrase there should be taken literally.
>
> Bhagavan in the recorded Talks was talking at the level of the seekers
> that asked him questions.  After all, in the BG, Krishna said only very few
> would ever achieve jnana.  And there can be some question over whether the
> recorder of the talks was accurate in his note-taking and interpretation.
> So his written works like Ulladu Narpadu and GVK have to be the best
> authority for his teaching.
>
> I suggest you find something in his written work (incl GVK) that would
> support the contention that utter desirelessness / disassociation with
> body-mind is not what is meant by jnana.  If he said it "many times”, then
> surely he or Muruganar must have written it down as well.  Whereas I can
> find you quite a few written quotes, like your own in this second verse,
> that makes exactly that point; let alone the guidance he gave to some of
> his closest disciples who lived lives of renunciation and austerity around
> him - Muruganar, Annamalai Swami, Chadwick, Sadhu Natananda, Sadhu Om, to
> name but a few.  Find a realised disciple in Ramana’s constellation who
> lived the life of a householder.
>
> The argument that Gaudapada / Sankara / the Upanishads were aimed at monks
> is a novel one, as opposed to elucidating what they believed was the
> highest truth to all.  Again, it is case of taking some teaching as gospel,
> and others as figurative or a product of their cultural times.  Convenient,
> no?
>
> Ramana’s actionlessness and renunciation from the outset - without having
> read any sruti - exemplifies exactly what  Sankara described as the life of
> a jivanmukta.  As Sw Chinmayananda said of him, ‘he is the cream of the
> upanishads’.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 16 Jun 2021, at 21:11, Akilesh Ayyar <ayyar at akilesh.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 3:09 PM Ven Balakrishnan <ventzu at yahoo.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> Four responses:
>>
>> 1) I’m just replaying your quote.  Do you believe Ramana was exaggerating
>> for effect?  What was his intention in writing such a strongly worded
>> phrase - surely not to mislead?
>>
>
> Not at all to mislead. It has to be understood, as I put it in my
> commentary: "By dying to what is changing — to what one thought one was,
> but in fact is not — one  realizes oneself to actually be the unchanging."
>
> The unchanging has no truck with either doing or not-doing. Those
> categories do not apply.
>
>
>>
>>
>> 2) Recall that Bhagavan when he arrived at Tiruvannamallai, sat
>> indifferent to his body and the insects biting him, let alone requirements
>> for food, for days on end.  He had to be force fed.
>>
>
> Yes, yes, and Bhagavan has said many times that his path is not for
> everyone and not required for jnana.
>
>
>>
>>
>> 3) Lakshmana Sarma - who received personal instruction on Ulladu Narpadu
>> from Bhagavan - wrote this in HIS commentary on this verse:
>>
>> “The knowledge born out of personal experience that worldly life is
>> riddled with sorrow turns one through dispassion towards nivritti marga,
>> the path of withdrawal from activity or of renunciation.
>>
>
> Nivritti marga agani has to be understood. True renunciation is the
> renunciation of the ego, not of gross physical activity, as both Ramana and
> the Bhagavad Gita have said repeatedly.
>
>
>>
>>
>> 4) Then there is Gaudapada, MK 2.37:
>>
>> “He should have this body and the Atman as his support and depend upon
>> chances, ie he should be satisfied with those things for his physical
>> wants, that chance brings him”
>>
>> Sankara underscores this in his bhasya to this verse
>> “He entirely depends on circumstances, that is to say, he maintains his
>> body with whatever food or strips of cloth, etc are brought to him by mere
>> chance”
>>
>
> Yes, we understand that these are the monastic traditions they worked in.
> But that's because these Upanishads were geared towards monks. This is not
> the requirement for jnana for everyone.
>
>
>>
>>
>> Hope that clarifies what ‘dead to themselves and their possessions’ means.
>>
>>
>> > On 16 Jun 2021, at 16:44, Akilesh Ayyar via Advaita-l <
>> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > If so, why would they eat?
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 4:07 AM Ven Balakrishnan <ventzu at yahoo.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> “DEAD TO THEMSELVES AND THEIR POSSESSIONS”
>> >>
>> >> Ramanamaharishi is entirely consistent with Sankara saying a jnani will
>> >> inevitably take up the life of a paramahamsa ascetic, since s/he has no
>> >> desires, no fear, no attachments, not even to body-mind - like a snake
>> that
>> >> has shed its skin.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Sent from my iPad
>> >>
>> >>> On 15 Jun 2021, at 17:26, Akilesh Ayyar via Advaita-l <
>> >> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Namaste,
>> >>>
>> >>> This is the commentary on the next verse.
>> >>>
>> >>> From
>> >>>
>> >>
>> https://www.siftingtothetruth.com/blog/2021/6/15/commentary-on-ramanas-forty-verses-invocatory-part-two-of-two
>> >>> :
>> >>>
>> >>> II. THOSE WHO KNOW INTENSE FEAR OF DEATH SEEK REFUGE ONLY AT THE FEET
>> OF
>> >>> THE LORD WHO HAS NEITHER DEATH NOR BIRTH. DEAD TO THEMSELVES AND THEIR
>> >>> POSSESSIONS, CAN THE THOUGHT OF DEATH OCCUR TO THEM AGAIN? DEATHLESS
>> ARE
>> >>> THEY.
>> >>>
>> >>> *Commentary:* All fear is rooted in the fear of death. But death can
>> only
>> >>> afflict what is born, that is, what is changing: that is, what is
>> >> thought.
>> >>> We have just seen that what is Real is unchanging, and that what is
>> Real
>> >> is
>> >>> us.
>> >>>
>> >>> The Lord who has neither birth nor death is none other than this very
>> >>> Reality, the Heart. This Lord may go by many other names — Shiva or
>> >> Vishnu
>> >>> or God or the Goddess, for example. But ultimately they all refer to
>> this
>> >>> unchanging Reality.
>> >>>
>> >>> In order to take refuge at the feet of this Lord, all else must be
>> given
>> >>> up. This giving up is a kind of death. By dying to what is changing —
>> to
>> >>> what one thought one was, but in fact is not — one realizes oneself to
>> >>> actually be the unchanging. What seems mortal has in fact never been
>> born
>> >>> to begin with, and what is immortal cannot die. And the thought of
>> death
>> >>> cannot occur to the immortals, which are those who have given up their
>> >>> stake in everything changing.
>> >>>
>> >>> At any time, see all the forty verses posts that I have published so
>> far
>> >>> here
>> >>> <
>> https://www.siftingtothetruth.com/blog/tag/Forty%20Verses%20Commentary
>> >>> .
>> >>> Akilesh Ayyar
>> >>> Spiritual guidance - http://www.siftingtothetruth.com/
>> >>> ᐧ
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Archives: https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>> >>> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>> >>>
>> >>> To unsubscribe or change your options:
>> >>> https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>> >>>
>> >>> For assistance, contact:
>> >>> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>> >>
>> >> ᐧ
>> > ᐧ
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Archives: https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>> > http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>> >
>> > To unsubscribe or change your options:
>> > https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>> >
>> > For assistance, contact:
>> > listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>>
>> ᐧ
> ᐧ
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Archives: https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita

To unsubscribe or change your options:
https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org