[Advaita-l] "One subjectivity" and "No creation" reference to Advaita

Kaushik Chevendra chevendrakaushik at gmail.com
Mon Sep 27 10:20:35 EDT 2021


Namaste sir.
As you have pointed out that the main dissimilarity between buddhism and av
is that av is vedic tradition. Just as a judge's verdict is alone
justice,and a commoners verdict even though inline with the judge's view
isn't justice,mithyatva of jagat should be understood through shruthi vakya
only.

On Mon, 27 Sep, 2021, 5:04 pm Bhaskar YR, <bhaskar.yr at hitachi-powergrids.com>
wrote:

> praNAms
>
> Hare Krishna
>
>
>
>    - Kindly pardon me, I don’t want to go deep into it as my knowledge in
>    Buddhism is quite poor (almost nil) and what I read about buddhism is only
>    what is available in advaita works😊  So cannot authoritatively say
>    anything about doctrine of Buddhism according to their accepted authentic
>    works.  If I am right, even in the Buddhism also they will accept the
>    existence (astitvaM).  The existence of shUnyatvaM.  And in vijnAnavAda too
>    they accept the existence of constructive imagination of external object by
>    chitta (mind).  The kArikAkAra too attributes the existence of external
>    objects to kampana (vibration) of chitta.  Samanvaya needs to be done with
>    the help of shruti, yukti and anubhava.
>
>
>
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
>
> bhaskar
>
>
>
> Namaste sir.
>
> You have given quite an excellent response. From your post it seems to be
> that the dualists contention is true. Probably the scholars will have to
> shed light on this.
>
> In my opinion the difference between the shunya and brahman is existence.
> In the sense that shunya is absence of anything. Whereas in av there is
> absence of anything other than brahman.
>
>
>


More information about the Advaita-l mailing list