[Advaita-l] [advaitin] rAma-krishna-shiva-durga etc. are not same in shAstric vyavahAra!!!

[Bhaskar YR]

Yes this is the view of sampradaya. The distinction of forms of isvara is only different in forms and names. Not in their isvartva.

praNAms 
Hare Krishna

Same is the case with jeeva, jeevatva or parichinnatvaM as such is not there.  It is due to ignorance (mUdha-s) Kalpana or the ignorants due to identifying Chaitanya with upAdhi.  Para eva Atma dehendriya manObuddhyupAdhibhiH paricchidyamAnaH 'bAlaiH' shAreera ityupacharyate, clarifies bhAshyakAra in sUtra.  If you exclude IshwarOpAdhi or jeevOpAdhi what remains is Chaitanya.  So bheda is with regard to this chaitanya's projections through different types of upAdhi-s.  tattvawise all are ekaM eva but when this tattva's manifestations or vyAkruta rUpa is bhedAtmaka only due to upAdhi saMbandha.  

Hari Hari Hari Bol!!! 
Bhaskar YR
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Advaita-l <advaita-l-bounces at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> On Behalf Of Kaushik Chevendra via Advaita-l
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2023 10:51 AM
To: Venkatraghavan S <agnimile at gmail.com>
Cc: Kaushik Chevendra <chevendrakaushik at gmail.com>; Advaitin <advaitin at googlegroups.com>; A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] [advaitin] rAma-krishna-shiva-durga etc. are not same in shAstric vyavahAra!!!

Warning

This email comes from outside of Hitachi Energy. Make sure you verify the sender before clicking any links or downloading/opening attachments.
If this email looks suspicious, report it by clicking 'Report Phishing' button in Outlook.
See the SecureWay group in Yammer for more security information.

>
> In fact, if we accept bheda between two forms of Ishvara in all 
> respects in vyavahAra then it is as good as saying there are two 
> Ishvara-s, which would be absurd. But to avoid that we do not have to 
> admit there is atyanta abheda between two forms of Ishvara in 
> vyavahAra either. Nor do we have to say only one of the two is Ishvara either, as vishiShTAdvaita / dvaita say.
>
> We instead say both Shiva and Vishnu are Ishvara only, they have just 
> taken different names and forms for our benefit.
>
Namaste sir.
Yes this is the view of sampradaya. The distinction of forms of isvara is only different in forms and names. Not in their isvartva.

>
> Regards,
> Venkatraghavan
>
>>
_______________________________________________
Archives: https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.advaita-vedanta.org%2Farchives%2Fadvaita-l%2F&data=05%7C01%7Cbhaskar.yr%40hitachienergy.com%7C962a5e3d6a5b4030325108db09944ed3%7C7831e6d9dc6c4cd19ec61dc2b4133195%7C0%7C0%7C638114304802477512%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=0Ks9HhSpIxMI1yi6PlJqLAIXY6dOCuLwcJOMBU8ZhqY%3D&reserved=0

To unsubscribe or change your options:
https://eur04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.advaita-vedanta.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Flistinfo%2Fadvaita-l&data=05%7C01%7Cbhaskar.yr%40hitachienergy.com%7C962a5e3d6a5b4030325108db09944ed3%7C7831e6d9dc6c4cd19ec61dc2b4133195%7C0%7C0%7C638114304802477512%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=VCkqcheR1%2BtnyG%2F10XQo7AWuAW8xksreR6jMyCzEuH8%3D&reserved=0

For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org