[Advaita-l] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [advaitin] Re: pratiyogI-jnAna being mandatory for abhAva-jnAna

[Ananta Chaitanya [Sarasvati]]

Namaste. Apologies, replying to myself since i see that there is a request
to explain the ongoing discussion in layman's terms, as well as, calling it
as shuSka tarka!! Then, there is also an imagination that someone is
claiming that since A and B exist, therefore C should exist! No one is
claiming that. prAptasyaiva pratiShedhaH kartavyaH, na tu aprAptasya.

This is exactly how sampradAya has been misunderstood by some. If i don't
even know what is being argued, let alone why, what compulsion should I
have to publicly opine it as wrong?! mAyayA sarvasya sambhavAt. :-)

Kind rgds,
--Ananta Chaitanya
/* येनेदं सर्वं विजानाति, तं केन विजानीयात्। Through what should one know
That, owing to which all this is known! [Br.Up. 4.5.15] */