[Advaita-l] ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [advaitin] Re: pratiyogI-jnAna being mandatory for abhAva-jnAna

[Ananta Chaitanya [Sarasvati]]

Namaste Venkat ji,

Looks like i missed the lists in the earlier reply. Also making a
correction herewith: there is no gauravadoSha that i mentioned since the
abhAva is atyantAbhAva not ananoyAbhAva. My apologies.

Kind rgds,
--Ananta Chaitanya
/* येनेदं सर्वं विजानाति, तं केन विजानीयात्। Through what should one know
That, owing to which all this is known! [Br.Up. 4.5.15] */

On Thu, Aug 1, 2024, 11:21 AM Ananta Chaitanya [Sarasvati] <
bhatpraveen at gmail.com> wrote:

> Namaste Venkat ji,
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024, 10:52 AM Venkatraghavan S <agnimile at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> So, vikalpa is not a jnAnAkArA vRtti. If that is the case, there is an
>> exception to the rule that abhAva jnAna requires pratiyogi jnAna.
>>
>
> Thanks. That yoga view makes sense.
>
>
>>> Yes, I agree the two pada-s have pada-padArtha sambandha, the two pada-s
>> also have samsarga between each other, but the vAkya has no object
>> corresponding to it, that is, there is no sambandha between the vAkya and
>> vAkyArtha - hence शब्दज्ञानानुपाती वस्तुशून्यो विकल्पः.
>>
>
> True, in which case, i would also think recalling Chhandogya's
> asadevedamagra AsIt. That is, the na~n of abhAva would go with the vAkya
> and not pada.
>
>
>>> Further, in शशशृङ्ग, what do you consider the avacchedaka for shRnga as?
>>> shasha, shashashRngatva or something else? (Just trying to apply the
>>> ongoing study of dinakarI here :) )
>>>
>> The pratiyogitAvacChedaka dharma is shashashRNgatva in my view.
>>
>
> Yes, but there would be gauravadoSha here. Anyway, thanks for the
> discussion.
>
> gurupAdukAbhyAm,
> --Ananta Chaitanya
> /* येनेदं सर्वं विजानाति, तं केन विजानीयात्। Through what should one know
> That, owing to which all this is known! [Br.Up. 4.5.15] */
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>> Kind rgds,
>>> --Ananta Chaitanya
>>> /* येनेदं सर्वं विजानाति, तं केन विजानीयात्। Through what should one
>>> know That, owing to which all this is known! [Br.Up. 4.5.15] */
>>>
>>>>