[Advaita-l] [advaitin] ajnAna is different from jnAna-abhAva, mithyA-jnAna and mithyA-jnAna-samskAra

[Bhaskar YR]

Conclusion
The necessity of positing a bhAvarUpa ajnAna is logically untenable within Advaita Vedanta's framework. The non-illumination of Brahman in sushupti and vyavahAra can be adequately explained by jnAna-abhAva, samskAras, or mithyA-jnAna without requiring a distinct, positive entity. The opponent's simpler explanations are sufficient and do not introduce unnecessary ontological complications.

praNAms Sri MCC prabhuji
Hare Krishna

It is really unfortunate that even AI could understand these simple things but real intelligence cannot!!  Perhaps this is due to over dependence on dry logic as against simple day to day  experience.

Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
bhaskar