[Advaita-l] Eka-sattA-vAda vis-a-vis sattA-traividhya-vAda

[suresh chattu]

Answer from ChatGPT
Eka-sattā-vāda (One-Reality Theory)

   1.

   *Monistic View*: Asserts that there is only one ultimate reality. All
   diversities and multiplicities are appearances or manifestations of this
   single reality.
   2.

   *Advaita Vedanta*: Prominently represented by Advaita Vedanta, which
   posits Brahman as the only reality, with the world (jagat) and individual
   souls (jiva) being mere appearances (māyā or avidyā).
   3.

   *Illusion of Diversity*: The perceived diversity in the world is an
   illusion (māyā). The differences and distinctions are not ultimately real
   but are due to ignorance (avidyā).
   4.

   *Non-Dualism*: Emphasizes non-dualism (advaita), meaning there is no
   second entity apart from the ultimate reality (Brahman).

Sattā-traividhya-vāda (Three-Reality Theory)

   1.

   *Pluralistic View*: Asserts that reality is threefold. It recognizes
   three distinct types of reality or existence.
   2.

   *Dvaita Vedanta*: Often associated with Dvaita Vedanta, which posits
   three categories: Ishvara (God), jiva (individual soul), and jagat (world),
   each having its own reality.
   3.

   *Co-Existence of Realities*: The three realities coexist independently.
   Unlike the illusionary view of diversity in eka-sattā-vāda,
   sattā-traividhya-vāda maintains that the distinctions are real and not a
   product of ignorance.
   4.

   *Dualism and Pluralism*: Emphasizes dualism (dvaita) or pluralism,
   acknowledging the independent and real existence of multiple entities.

Key Differences

   1.

   *Nature of Reality*: Eka-sattā-vāda posits a single, unified reality
   (Brahman) with the apparent multiplicity being an illusion, while
   sattā-traividhya-vāda accepts the real existence of multiple categories of
   reality (God, soul, and world).
   2.

   *Perception of Diversity*: In eka-sattā-vāda, diversity is seen as an
   illusion created by ignorance. In sattā-traividhya-vāda, diversity is real
   and inherent in the nature of existence.
   3.

   *Philosophical Approach*: Eka-sattā-vāda leans towards a monistic and
   non-dualistic approach, emphasizing unity. Sattā-traividhya-vāda adopts a
   dualistic or pluralistic approach, emphasizing the real distinctions and
   multiplicity in existence.

Examples to Illustrate

   -

   *Eka-sattā-vāda*: The famous analogy of the rope and the snake is used
   in Advaita Vedanta. A rope in dim light is mistaken for a snake. The snake
   (world) is an illusion, and the rope (Brahman) is the reality.
   -

   *Sattā-traividhya-vāda*: In Dvaita Vedanta, the analogy of the
   relationship between the ocean, waves, and bubbles is used. The ocean
   (Ishvara), waves (jiva), and bubbles (jagat) are all distinct and real
   entities, though they are related and interact.

These distinctions form the core philosophical differences between the two
schools of thought regarding the nature of reality and existence.

On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 7:39 AM Sudhanshu Shekhar via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

> Hari Om,
>
> What are the main points of distinction between Eka-sattA-vAda and
> sattA-traividhya-vAda?
>
> Also, kindly suggest some reading material on this issue.
>
> Regards.
> Sudhanshu Shekhar.
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>