[Advaita-l] [advaitin] 'Avidya' is not 'only' Adhyasa; it's more than that

[H S Chandramouli]

Namaste Sudhanshu Ji,

First three are abhAva. They are not covered by the definition.

Regards

On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 3:33 PM Sudhanshu Shekhar <sudhanshu.iitk at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Namaste Chandramouli ji.
>
>
>> Reg  // Because adhyasta entity by definition have a cause //,
>>
>> This rule is applicable only for a sAdi entity. Not for an anAdi entity.
>> That is the definition of anAdi. Insisting on a cause for anAdi is invalid
>> by definition.
>>
>
> 1. Is ghaTa-prAk-abhAva anAdi?
> 2. Is ghaTa-prAk-abhAva adhyasta?
> 3. Does ghaTa-prAk-abhAva have avidyA as the cause?
> 4. Is avidyA avidyA-kalpita?
>
> Regards.
> Sudhanshu Shekhar.
>