[Advaita-l] [advaitin] 'Avidya' is not 'only' Adhyasa; it's more than that

[H S Chandramouli]

Namaste Sudhanshu Ji,

Perhaps I made a mistake in mentioning Sri SSS name. He has nothing to do
with the earlier observation by me copied below

//  Reg  // Because adhyasta entity by definition have a cause //,

This rule is applicable only for a sAdi entity. Not for an anAdi entity.
That is the definition of anAdi. Insisting on a cause for anAdi is invalid
by definition //.

This is purely my understanding. Please ignore my post concerning Sri SSS.

Regards

On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 4:02 PM Sudhanshu Shekhar <sudhanshu.iitk at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Namaste Chandramouli ji.
>
> One can make his rules. But others are not bound to accept them na! Our
> rules should be open for discussion. Just to remove objections, we cannot
> change the rules of the game. Can we!
>
> Simple question: Is avidyA avidyA-kalpita?
>
> If yes, then how is it not AtmAshraya? If no, then avidyA no longer
> remains adhyasta.
>
> Regards.
> Sudhanshu Shekhar.
>