[Advaita-l] [advaitin] Re: Bhagavad Gita - As it actually is | Sanatana Dharma | Sri Shankara Bhagavatpada & Bhakti | Sringeri

Bhaskar YR bhaskar.yr at hitachienergy.com
Tue Apr 22 06:09:42 EDT 2025


praNAms
Hare Krishna

I am just sharing my thoughts, not sure whether it is in alignment with your perspective i.e. shakti is something different from mAya.  As per my understanding shakti is synonymous with prakruti and prakruti is synonymous with mAyA, the causal potentiality of the world.  Which is explained as mAyA as somany places in PTB.  In that mAya state the jeevaatma-s are enveloped in ignorance of their true nature.  And this mAyA (the causal potentiality) has been explained and admitted as a previous state of the world dependent on the brahman (here again mAyA is mUlaprakruti / avyAkruta) and NOT independent of him.  As I said it would serve the definite purpose in explaining the srushti prakriya as bhAshyakAra says without it brahman cannot be a creator since without this power HE cannot be active.  So again as per my understanding there is no difference between brahman and its shakti and no difference between this shakti and its kArya.  Again here the concept of mAya is to be understood as causal potentiality of the world and a special aspect of brahman which evolves itself into  the world.  But brahman in its true and real nature is above all causation.  This is what I have understood from kArya-kAraNa prakriya and mAya as the causal potentiality (shakti) of brahman.

With this understanding I would like to address your objection here :

I am not sure I understood  this correctly. In the first sentence you are saying mAyA is the shakti. In the second sentence you are saying  ** shakti or shakta is Shuddha brahman only **. The two appear to me to be contradictory.


  *   Not so IMO, because as I have already said mAyA is shakti and this shakti is not different from shakta.  In the kArya-kAraNa prakriya the shakti which we inhere in the cause cannot be different from cause as the bhAshya says the power  is identical with the cause and the effect is identical with the power.  BTW, this is not my own theory bhAshyakAra himself saying this in sUtra bhAshya.


  *   I am yet to understand how this shakti is something different from mAyA and Shuddha Chaitanya is shakti but not mAyA !!!

Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
bhaskar



More information about the Advaita-l mailing list