[Advaita-l] [advaitin] PanvhadashI 2.35

[H S Chandramouli]

Namaste Bhaskar Ji,

For Sri Bhagavatpada, Brahman is the ever **existing** adhishthAna. Subject
to this only, any **other** adhishthAna may or may not be essential. That
is exactly what the verse under discussion states. Are you saying Sri
Bhagavatpada does not insist on even Brahman being necessary as adhishthAna
for bhrAnti?

Regards

On Fri, Jan 10, 2025 at 3:07 PM 'Bhaskar YR' via advaitin <
advaitin at googlegroups.com> wrote:

> Conclusion being that such भ्रमः (Bhramah) (superimposition) without a
> अधिष्ठान (adhiShThAna) (Base or Support) is impossible to find. Hence
> such an anumAna by the sUnyavAdin is wrong.
>
> praNAms Sri ChandramouLi prabhuji
>
> Hare Krishna
>
>
>
> Is this not clarified by bhAshyakAra in adhyAsa by giving the example of
> talamalanAdi parikalpitam??  There is no need for invariable existence of
> adhishtAnaM to get the bhrAnti jnAna.  Atma is not pratyaksha gOchara where
> as adhyArOpita deha is pratyaksha, so anyonyAdhyAsa is not a possibility is
> the doubt, but bhAshyakAra clarifies this with another example that Atman
> is ahaM pratyaya gOchara.
>
>
>
> Hari Hari Hari Bol!!!
>
> bhaskar
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "advaitin" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to advaitin+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/AM7PR06MB6625F95EFE9F76DF08359887841C2%40AM7PR06MB6625.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/advaitin/AM7PR06MB6625F95EFE9F76DF08359887841C2%40AM7PR06MB6625.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>