[Advaita-l] Chakilam Venkatesh - Controversy???
Sangeerth P
psangeerthgenius at gmail.com
Thu Nov 6 22:27:22 EST 2025
Namaste ji
Thank you for your clarification. But can you please tell about this
Chakilam guy? Is he really from Aham Brahmasmi? And he is citing sutras
which does not exists at all. Wont this be bringing the reputation of Aham
Brahmasmi foundation to streets? Refuting Advaita or Vishishtadvaita has
been done for 100 of years wherein one paksha will say you did not
understand the opponents paksha. But the errors which Chakkilam ji is
pointing to does not go in hand with Advaita acharyas themselves right?
Because those kinds of sutras or vishnu purana sloka does not exists is
what Vishwas ji is pointing to. How do we understand this fact?
Regards
Sangeerth P
8608658009
On Fri, Nov 7, 2025 at 5:18 AM Vikram Jagannathan via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
> Namaskaram Sangeerth ji & Swagata ji,
>
> The critic (Youtube id: Vishvas Vasuki) seems to belong to Visishtadvaita
> Sri-Vaishnava sampradayam (non-Advaitin). I would take his criticisms of
> Advaita (and Advaitin) with a bucket-load of salt and instead reach out to
> an Advaita acharya to clarify the Advaita position.
>
> Unless you have already done so; prior to getting the clarification (or
> confirmation) from an Advaita acharya, it is strongly recommended to
> refrain from denigrating (such as "bringing the pedestal of Sringeri to
> streets") an Advaita scholar.
>
> Below is my personal opinion:
>
> I just listened to 1 video (
> https://youtu.be/LIX8SNz-Pl8?si=OWDGfv3ddKeC2TRD)
> and to me this is the critic's clear misunderstanding, mischaracterization
> and misrepresentation of Advaita.
>
> Atman in paramarthika sense is indeed absolutely changeless and unmoving.
> In vyavaharika, due to adhyasa with sukshma and karana shariras, the
> perceived jivatma transmigrates. This is a clear Advaita stance and the
> critic has failed to understand the siddhanta prior to criticizing Advaita.
> The two shlokas from SBG refer to these distinct perspectives. 2.24 is
> clearly paramarthika whereas 8.24 is vyavaharika. The critic is confusing
> the two perspectives.
>
> At the 8:54 minute mark the critic says that "some Shankarans (implying
> Advitins) make Bhagavan Shri Krishna to be an insane person"! Kindly point
> to an Advaita acharya or Advaita granta where Bhagavan is said to be so!
>
> At the 12:18 minute mark the critic says that "Sankaracharya twisted Veda
> Vyasa's views very clearly".
>
> At the 15:30 minute mark, there is an attempt by the critic to state
> Advaita siddhanta as taught by Swami Sankaracharya. The attempt is an
> inaccurate, misrepresentation of Advaita siddhanta.
>
> One's own misunderstanding of Advaita should not be mischaracterized as a
> flaw in the siddhanta. Neither does restating one's own sampradhayam
> perspective imply inaccuracy of Advaita bhashya.
> *To me, the criticism is baseless, biased and flawed; It doesn't warrant
> listening to any other of the critic's videos.*
>
> If there are questions on quotations / references, that can (and should) be
> taken up individually & specifically with the teacher directly.
>
> *Note: I have not listened to Shri Venkatesh Chakkilam's discourses and
> hence, notwithstanding accuracy of his Advaita teaching, my opinion is
> limited to the criticism in the aforementioned video.*
>
> prostrations,
> Vikram
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2025 at 9:49 AM Swagata Chowdhury via Advaita-l <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>
> > I do not believe he is actually associated with *Aham Brahmāsmi*.
> However,
> > that organization tends to invite people rather freely—much like Indica.
> > Indica has, on multiple occasions, invited certain fraudulent individuals
> > to their programs. Later, some scholars sent them an email, they
> confirmed
> > that they would no longer invite him.
> >
> > In my opinion, it is preferable to invite only those with a genuine
> > Sanskrit background—whether academic or traditional. And if someone is
> from
> > a different field, they should at least have strong recommendations from
> > respected Sanskrit scholars.
> >
> > swagata
> >
> > On Thu, 6 Nov 2025, 1:16 pm Sangeerth P via Advaita-l, <
> > advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Namaskaram
> > >
> > > What is this happening with this Chakillam Venkatesh? Is he really from
> > > ahambrahmasmi team? He is bringing the pedestal of Sringeri to streets
> I
> > > feel by citing sutras which are no where found and slokas from Vishnu
> > > puranam no where found.
> > >
> > > Gita-2-17
> > > https://youtu.be/LIX8SNz-Pl8?si=cRqz1Ofo8yaxZ0G1
> > >
> > > Gita-2-24
> > > https://youtu.be/tXpUd-mYzNs?si=GWR-UwiQ1ehwIgCa
> > >
> > > His arrogance
> > > https://youtu.be/hjdiTt9ikaI?si=hVOEGldf4bwG8WiD
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Sangeerth P
> > > 8608658009
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Archives: https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> > >
> > > To unsubscribe or change your options:
> > > https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> > >
> > > For assistance, contact:
> > > listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Archives: https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> >
> > To unsubscribe or change your options:
> > https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> >
> > For assistance, contact:
> > listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> https://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list