Dispassion

[Ian Goddard]

At 11:16 PM 6/7/96 -0400, M & E Shearn wrote:

 >> The attachment of internal mind (A) to external world (~A)
 >> is a logical expression of their inherent unity.
 >
 > IAN,
 > may I ask who is the witness to these?

I am

 > Who is the comentator?

I am

 > If I am is
 > nobody who knows it?


I, I am nobody / null

good (+) commentary is good (+) only relative to bad (-)

   (+) implies => (-), (+) <=> (-) => union => 0 => null

thus all commentary is not other than I am


 >> The attachment of internal mind (A) to external world (~A)
 >> is a logical expression of their inherent unity.

 > What is the *their* which posesses a unity?

the whole, I am the whole = (A + ~A)

 > Who's logic
 > is it?

nobody's

 > Internal and external are two?

internal and external are unitary



Law of Identity: A is A, relative to not-A. A = {A, ~A}

Law of Nonidentity: If there is 100% A, there is 0% A. A = ~A

absolute reality: http://www.erols.com/igoddard/reality.html