Dispassion

[M & E Shearn]

At 12:33 PM 6/8/96 -0400, you wrote:
>At 11:16 PM 6/7/96 -0400, M & E Shearn wrote:
>
> >> The attachment of internal mind (A) to external world (~A)
> >> is a logical expression of their inherent unity.
> >
> > IAN,
> > may I ask who is the witness to these?
>
>I am
>
> > Who is the comentator?
>
>I am
>
> > If I am is
> > nobody who knows it?
>
>
>I, I am nobody / null
>
>good (+) commentary is good (+) only relative to bad (-)
>
>   (+) implies => (-), (+) <=> (-) => union => 0 => null
>
>thus all commentary is not other than I am
>
>
> >> The attachment of internal mind (A) to external world (~A)
> >> is a logical expression of their inherent unity.
>
> > What is the *their* which posesses a unity?
>
>the whole, I am the whole = (A + ~A)
>
> > Who's logic
> > is it?
>
>nobody's
>
> > Internal and external are two?
>
>internal and external are unitary
>

 how can I am say this is that and that is not that?
Iam is both = and ~. Who sees it as such? If you say nobody who says it?
Nobody can not say something? Too deep for this one.
in Him
love
e.j.