ahudli at APPN.CI.IN.AMERITECH.COM
Tue Nov 12 08:22:04 CST 1996
On Mon, 11 Nov 1996, Ramakrishnan Balasubramanian wrote:
> I have sometimes wondered about the same thing, i.e., sha.nkara's stressing of
> the sanyaasa aashrama. Since the aachaarya has also written a bhaashhya on the
> giita, which separates the sanyaasa from the sanyaasaashrama. Perhaps he did
> not want dedicated aspirants into being mislead that they had actually
> renounced everything when they had not. After all suffering the pangs of
> (quite a possibility as a sanyaasi) would be much more difficult.
In the giitaa bhaashhya, Shankara makes it clear that karma done
with renunciation of fruits thereof acts as a great purifier and leads
one to jnaana. However, he is quite emphatic in saying that it is jnaana
alone, not a combination of karma and jnaana, that results in mokshha.
He makes the same argument in the upadeshasaahasrii also, regarding the
combination of karma and jnaana. But the Achaarya does recognize that not
everyone is fit for sannyaasa, citing Arjuna as an example, and points out
that Krishna prescribes karma yoga (and bhakti) to such persons.
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list