aananda

[Charles Wikner]

Greetings,

Sadananda wrote:

> ... advaita (non-duel) ...

Sound advice for the list :-)

> ... anantameva ananda ...

Pithy gems like this delight the mind!

Do you recall the source of this? There is an obvious connection
with the mahaavaakya in Tait.2.1.1 and the etymology of Brahman
given in BSB.1.1.1 --- um, that should read etymology of the word
`brahman' :-) --- but why is `anantam' neuter here?

Regards,
Charles.

>From  Mon Nov 18 17:49:05 1996
Message-Id: <MON.18.NOV.1996.174905.GMT.>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 1996 17:49:05 GMT
Reply-To: kstuart at mail.telis.org
To: "Advaita (non-duality) with reverence" <ADVAITA-L at TAMU.EDU>
From: Ken Stuart <kstuart at MAIL.TELIS.ORG>
Subject: Re: JIVA-MAN
Comments: To: "Advaita (non-duality) with reverence" <ADVAITA-L at TAMU.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <199611150433.XAA27149 at cancerous.braincells.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hello,

On Fri, 15 Nov 1996 11:34:10 -0500, "Jaldhar H. Vyas"
<jaldhar at BRAINCELLS.COM> wrote:

>True, just being a sannyasi doesn't guarantee Moksha but not being a
>Sannyasi guarantees you won't acheive Moksha.

According to which scripture (including chapter and verse please) ?


Namaskar,

Ken

kstuart at mail.telis.org
http://www.zynet.com/~castlerx/kstuart/KSphilosophy.html