Time Bound (revisited)

[Charles A. Hillig]

>>      Maybe we can only really speak of an "is-ness" which transcends all
>> duality.  (But, then again, "who's" really "there" to do the speaking?)
>>
>
>Great question, as long as we remain in the "who."  As soon as we demand
>the answer, we are lost again.

>Mark


     I'm not sure that we can ever really "lose our way."
     For example, maybe demanding an answer actually IS "our way."

     Maybe we just have to keep on asking our questions
                                          until we finally run out of  them.

                                         With Blessings,


                                       Chuck Hillig