Neti Yoga

[Srikrishna Ghadiyaram]

Hari  Om !!

--- Ashish Chandra <ramkisno at HOTMAIL.COM> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2002 21:37:53 -0700, Jagannath

> The question is really for Jaldhar but what I have
> been saying is that
> Advaita, the adjective, when used alone, could imply
> nothing else but
> Brahman (which alone is non-dual, blimishless etc.).
> However, Advaita in
> and of itself does not imply the term Advaita
> Vedanta.

If 'Advaita' implies 'Brahman', then 'Advaita' should
be a 'Noun' and not an 'adjective' right ?

But, what Sri Jaladhar is saying is that 'Advaita' is
an 'adjective' and the 'vedanta' word following is
implied, as in the 'Red' is running which is actually
supposed to express 'Red horse' is running.

Om Namo Narayanaya !!

Srikrishna

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! News - Today's headlines
http://news.yahoo.com