[Advaita-l] Re: svanubhavah and brahmAtma samsthitih

[Amuthan]

On 3/15/07, Siva Senani Nori <sivasenani_at_yahoo.com> wrote:
([why?] Due to the falsity of those four on account of the saguNa
brahma being their object, and due to the non-presence of the form of
Brahman devoid of the three divisions {I think, satva-rajo-tama
guNas}in saguNa [brahman].
..............................

i think AchArya is referring to the absence of desha, kAla and vastu
parichCheda in nirguNa brahman when he uses the term
'parichChedatrayashUnyatva'.

--amudan.