[Advaita-l] praNava

[kuntimaddi sadananda]

Yaduji - PraNAms


avibhaktam vibhakteShu occurs in Giita 18-20 as  part of saatvika guNa.

Hari Om!
Sada



--- On Mon, 8/10/09, Dr. Yadu Moharir <ymoharir at yahoo.com> wrote:

> From: Dr. Yadu Moharir <ymoharir at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] praNava
> To: "A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta" <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
> Date: Monday, August 10, 2009, 8:52 PM
>  
> Namste Sunil-Ji:
>  
> The concept of "avibhakta.n vibhakteshhu" is relevent
> here from advaitic point of view.
> 
> As I recall, the reference you have mentioned is from
> discssion between Rama and Hanumana
>  
> There is a dohaa in Tulsidaasaa's "raamacharita manasa"
> that pertains to the concept of "ananya bhakti"
>  
> so ananya jaake.n asi mati na Tarai hanuma.nta |
> mai sevaka sa caraacara ruupa svaami bhagava.nta ||
> kiShkindhaakaaNDa 3 ||
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Dr. Yadu
> 
> --- On Mon, 8/10/09, Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> From: Sunil Bhattacharjya <sunil_bhattacharjya at yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] praNava
> To: "A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta" <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
> Date: Monday, August 10, 2009, 3:55 PM
> 
> 
> Dear friends,
>  
> Dvaitya is Saameepya Mukti  and Advaita is Saayujya Mukti,
> even when we talk in terms of the Saguna Brahman. Remember
> the reported statement of Hanuman that as an embodied
> being he is the servant of Lord Rama (the Dvaita concept),
> as a Jiva he is a part of  the Lord (yet separate, ie the
> Visistadvaita concept) and from the angle of
> realisation of the Atman he is the Lord Himself (the
> Advaita concept).
>  
> Any comment?
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Sunil K. Bhattacharjya
> 
> --- On Mon, 8/10/09, Bhadraiah Mallampalli <vaidix at hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> 
> From: Bhadraiah Mallampalli <vaidix at hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] praNava
> To: advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
> Date: Monday, August 10, 2009, 12:58 PM
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> >Would you put 'Om Namah Shivaya' beyond the >bounds
> of surrender or Advaita ? If so, I'm sorry for >you, in
> my Abrahmanic way.. :)
> 
> 
> I fail to understand your question. Om Namah Shivaya is
> dvaita, though traditionally dvaitists are vaishnavites. In
> dvaita jivatma is separate from paramatma, and at the time
> of kaivalyam it merges into Vishnu or Shiva. That is my
> understanding. Abrahamic surrender does not lead to such
> merger (I have heard of bent knees in case when a king
> conquers the world, but not in case of dealing with
> paramatma). I like to learn from list members if that is not
> the case. 
> 
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Bhadraiah
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your vacation photos on your phone!
> http://windowsliveformobile.com/en-us/photos/default.aspx?&OCID=0809TL-HM
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> 
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> 
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> 
> 
> 
>       
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> 
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> 
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> 
> 
> 
>       
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> 
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> 
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>