[Advaita-l] Sivaanandalahari -35

[Anbu sivam2]

You are perfectly right. It should be paramaanantharanga.  Sorry for the
error.  Sometimes the Tamilian (with its disadvantageous phonetics) in me
seem to assert itself by sheer inertia!  Thaamasa gunam :(  I will try to be
careful.

By the way I like your blog!

Regards,

On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Naresh Cuntoor <nareshpc at gmail.com> wrote:

> Anbu ji,
>
> Thanks for the series
>
> Not to nitpick, but among the three important words that you pointed out
> ...
>
> > Sarvagnasya dhayaakarasya Paramaanandharanga
> >
> >
> > His dhayaa cannot be subject to any pariNaamam in the pravrthi such as
> > 'karOtheethi kara: dhayaayaa: kara: dhayaakara:'  but as the source of
> > dhayaa itself.
>
> Let us hope there is no 'dhaya' going on.. No straws to suck on here :)
>
> > as my *Paramaanandharangan*.
>
> While it is true that we may be 'andhenaiva nIyamAnAH yathAndhAH ...',
> in the present shloka there are no blind men. No andha, but 'anta'.
>
> PS: I take your point about typos. But I pointed these out because I
> have heard many people mispronouncing these letters.
>
>
> Naresh
> vaak.wordpress.com
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>