[Advaita-l]  Svarita in RV and YV (was Re: SRI SUKTAM - Meaning)
    Bhadraiah Mallampalli 
    vaidix at hotmail.com
       
    Fri Mar  6 10:06:05 CST 2009
    
    
  
 
Dear Andreas
Jaldharji has suggested the fastest possible method for you to learn all that 
you want to learn. If you get the brahmajnana all these subjects will reveal 
themselves to you without asking for books and literature.
 
In fact to go one step further, there are upanishats which even say one should 
become a brahmana (at least by end of life), so you can very well raise yourself 
from your current (whatever) level.
Many foreigners wasted their own time and our time trying to explore these 
subjects in adhoc manner, using the ideas to create other subjects. In fact 
use of English words like mind, vowel, consonant, tone, tune etc is the first 
mental block in understanding Hindu books. Otherwise it is all garbage in 
garbage out.  Nevertheless some of the works by foreign scholars is valuable 
because they included some explanatory notes by traditional Hindu scholars 
who lived in 19th century. Some foreign scholars even claim they have left 
Panini behind and made improvements in theory of grammar. 
 
Having said that, some of the Indian experimenters did their part in adding 
to confusion, as Shri Vidyasankar quoted instances of vedas being chanted 
to tunes of Carnatic music. However well intentioned these efforts are futile. 
 
The first requirement is always study of the six darshanas and mimamsas 
as per one's own family tradition and one's own self interest. If you do not 
have family tradition you can very wel start one, but stay warned how much 
it will be accepted by existing scholars. 
 
This does not mean there were no genuine musicians who made sincere attempts: 
I heard Late Shri Kunnakudi Vaidyanathan's rendering of Nagumomu in which he 
played vedic accents on violin by intellligently changing the tempo from carnatic 
to vedic and back to carnatic. Being a scholar is one thing. Being a poet is 
another thing. Scholars can only analyze and dissect. Poets can create. 
Admittedly every one is a poet at heart, our attempt should be to bring out 
that aspect instead of just being a scholar, and that is the very reason why 
we like become the creator by first attempting to reach advaita. Art in any 
form needs the heart of an artist. Poetry is also an art. In poetry again it can 
be prose (vedic brahmanas) or it may be simple vrttas and slokas like 
Bhajagovindam, ragas of carnatic music, or vedic chants and samas 
(in the order of increasing complexity). Each type of literary work has 
its own place, and all poetry needs the poet's creative heart. 
 
Research on convertibility from one form to another is also a poet's domain. 
Interchange between vedic and carnatic is indeed possible but you have to 
do a lot of circus, it won't be that simple. We will cross the bridge when we 
get to it. Till them let us practice advaita. 
 
(If you are just interested in doing your own thing and want some references
irrespective of tradition to come to your own conclusions, you can try Indology list.)
 
Regards
Bhadraiah
 
 
 
 
 
 
_________________________________________________________________
HotmailĀ® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. 
http://windowslive.com/online/hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_HM_70faster_032009
    
    
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list