[Advaita-l] Why should Brahman be without form or attributes?
ramesamvijaya at yahoo.com
Mon Jun 18 02:16:38 CDT 2012
Sorry for the inconvenience.
The last line in my previous mail should read as "Hence Brahman is said to be Inexpressible" instead of "Hence Brahman is said to be Indescribable."
From: ramesam vemuri <ramesamvijaya at yahoo.com>
To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Why should Brahman be without form or attributes?
It follows from the above that concepts like 'maya, avidya etc.' are in fact dispensable in Advaita - they are merely explanatory artifacts to satisfy a curious mind. Hence Brahman is said to be Indescribable.
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list