[Advaita-l] Why should Brahman be without form or attributes?

[ramesam vemuri]

Sorry for the inconvenience.

The last line in my previous mail should read as "Hence Brahman is said to be Inexpressible" instead of  "Hence Brahman is said to be Indescribable."
 
 


________________________________
 From: ramesam vemuri <ramesamvijaya at yahoo.com>
To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> 
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2012 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Why should Brahman be without form or attributes?
 
 
It follows from the above that concepts like 'maya, avidya etc.' are in fact dispensable in Advaita - they are merely explanatory artifacts to satisfy a curious mind. Hence Brahman is said to be Indescribable.

regards