[Advaita-l] Is there a Cityupanisad?

[V Subrahmanian]

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Balasubramanian Ramakrishnan <
rama.balasubramanian at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> It is not cit + upaniShad which would be citupaniShad. It seems likely
> that it is citti + upaniShad = cittyupaniShad. The chapter (3) starts
> with "citti sruk" and so on. So it may be called thus by Swami
> Gambhiranandaji. In any case, it is not known by that name at least in
> the South Indian circles. The Tamils call that prashnam citti-pAtham.
>

In Karnataka I have heard this portion being referred to as
'chittiprashnaH' चित्तिप्रश्नः.

regards
subrahmanian.v

>
>
>