[Advaita-l] Supreme Brahman - the Ruler in Advaita?

[V Subrahmanian]

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 11:01 PM, Srinath Vedagarbha
<svedagarbha at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 8:24 AM, V Subrahmanian
> <v.subrahmanian at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 1:41 PM, <rajaramvenk at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> In 16.14, ishwara means the lord only. It is condemned as asuree bhava
> >> because it is a false thinking.
> >
> >
> > That is the mistake the non-advaitins make
>
> I hope you are not implying Madhusudhana is a non-advaitin!. This is
> because this whole conversation originated from Madhusudhana's
> position that Advaita is non-dualistic theism.
>

While I have not studied this supposed view of Madhusudana, the popular
Advaita siddhi invocation verse was pointed out by me to show that the
above supposed view of Madhusudana is not admissible in traditional Advaita
Vedanta.