[Advaita-l] Logical Basis of Soul

[Sujal Upadhyay]

Pranams RK ji,

I wonder why aren't yogis called as scientists !!!

Swami Rama says that even Aghoris are also scientists and are masters in
transforming one material into another. He has also cited e.g. of non-veg
food being transformed into Bengali delicacies. Kenaram is a very famous
Aghori.

Kind Regards


OM

Sujal Upadhyay

"To disconnect from the self and to become Aware of anything else is
nothing but unhappiness" - Bhagawan Ramana Maharshi

He who has faith has all
He who lacks faith, lacks all
It is the faith int he name of lord that works wonders
FAITH IS LIFE, DOUBT IS DEATH - Sri Ramakrishna


On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Srirudra <srirudra at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Sri Rajaram Venkataramani
> Science has so far not been able to focus on this .According to Brain
> studies the majority of the Neuro scientists have denied existence of
> anything like soul in the brain .Mind is only the name given to the
> thinking process and it is defined as a flow of thoughts.Why thoughts arise
> is still not known though theories are putforth.Really human being is a
> mystery.Of course the entire universe and its functions are un fathomable
> by our little brains.If at all soul is there it should be inside the brain
> is the thinking of most physiologists .i also hold the same
> view.R.Krishnamoorthy.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> > On 18-Nov-2013, at 11:35 am, rajaramvenk at gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > Thank you. I too thought the proof for soul is from shastras only and
> resisted attempts to establish by logic. However, in ikyamyadhikarana
> acharyal uses only logic to help lokayakas (materialists) understand soul.
> If science points to an independent soul, will it not be better for modern
> times?
> > Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: "Jaldhar H. Vyas" <jaldhar at braincells.com>
> > Sender: "Advaita-l" <advaita-l-bounces at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>Date:
> Sun, 17 Nov 2013 19:20:01
> > To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta<
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
> > Reply-To: A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta
> > <advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
> > Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] Logical Basis of Soul
> >
> >> On Sun, 17 Nov 2013, Rajaram Venkataramani wrote:
> >>
> >> Is there an English translation available?
> >
> > Atmatattvaviveka of Udayana; critical edition with English translation
> and
> > explanation by Narayana Shastri Dravid.  Indian Institute for Advanced
> > Study, Shimla, 1995.
> >
> >
> >> Sankara's approach indicates
> >> that logic (without reliance on textual authority) can be used to
> determine
> >> if soul distinct from matter exists. One may rely on modern methods to
> do
> >> so. Is that right?
> >
> > atma means "self" as well as "soul." While the existence of self is,
> shall
> > we say, self-evident :-), the pramana for soul like any other adhyatmic
> > topic is from shastra only.
> >
> > --
> > Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at braincells.com>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> > http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> >
> > To unsubscribe or change your options:
> > http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> >
> > For assistance, contact:
> > listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> > _______________________________________________
> > Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> > http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
> >
> > To unsubscribe or change your options:
> > http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
> >
> > For assistance, contact:
> > listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
> _______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance, contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>