[Advaita-l] svabhAva of Atman IS 'sarvajnatvaM'

[Vidyasankar Sundaresan]

Dear Bhaskar,

 

If I remember right, Sri Anand Hudli did make a brief comment on this topic.
As for myself, I am content watching the discussion and don't much to say
on either side. There can be multiple views from the vyavahAra perspective.
In the paramArtha view, once nAnAtva has been rejected, why is there any
problem? 

 

Best regards,

Vidyasankar
 

> To: advaitin at yahoogroups.com; advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
> From: bhaskar.yr at in.abb.com
> Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:48:47 +0530
> Subject: [Advaita-l] svabhAva of Atman IS 'sarvajnatvaM'
> 
> praNAms
> Hare krishna
> 
> Kindly pardon me for the late response from my desk. I said earlier, I 
> was too busy at office and week end holidays as well ( had to attend 
> couple vaidika functions like dattu sveekara and Sri rAma pattAbhishekaM 
> as Ritvika). Hence I was not able to concentrate on this issue 
> appropriately. But, in the meanwhile, many mails have been exchanged 
> between Sri Subbu prabhuji and Sri Chandramouli prabhuji on this topic and 
> surprisingly I have not seen any active participation from other senior 
> prabhuji-s like Sri Vidya prabhuji, Sri Vyas prabhuji, Sri Anand Hudli 
> prabhuji and others. Anyway, what I thought now is, instead of replying 
> to earlier pending mails, let me share my thoughts in a separate mail with 
> a different heading so that prabhuji-s would come to know what exactly I 
> am trying to convey.
>