[Advaita-l] Please Learned Scholars answer these doubts about Advaitha Sidhanta..

[Harsha Bhat]

Sadananda Sir,
                                     You said
All the terms you have stated are only negation of all objects that can be
definable. They describe the indescribable using pointers (lakshyaartha)
for a seeker who has tuned his mind.

How sat-chit-ananda is negation of Gunas......

It says Directly as ananda is Brahman's attribute Right???

Similarly nithya trupta and Shanta....how they support neti-nethi..they say
asthi -asthi..righ?t as these as attribute??

How the subject shanta,nithya trupta and sat-chit -ananda are
avarchaneeya???

When we say sat-chit-ananda ...as brahman...how can we call avarchaneeya
Vasthu as sat-chit -ananda??

regards,
Harsha Bhat

On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Harsha Bhat <harsha9519 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thank you sir...
>
> For  you for your  wonderful explanation....
>
> Regards,
> Harsha Bhat
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 3:41 PM, kuntimaddi sadananda <
> kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> Harsha Bhatji - PraNAms
>>
>> Your emails further proves that Vedanta has to be studies systematically
>> under a competent teacher . A competent teacher is one who himself studied
>> Vedanta under another competent teachers.
>>
>> Just for short. Brahman means infinite-ness - anantam. Guna or attributes
>> define an object and differentiate one object from the other. Hence Guna's
>> belong to finite object. Infinite cannot be an object hence it is
>> undefinable - hence nirguna.
>>
>> Infinite itself is not an attribute of infinite - all it means is it
>> negates all finite and therefore attributable objects as not Brahman. All
>> the terms you have stated are only negation of all objects that can be
>> definable. They describe the indescribable using pointers (lakshyaartha)
>> for a seeker who has tuned his mind.
>>
>> Brahman itself is indefinable as stated by the scriptures - na vaak
>> gachchati, na manaH.
>>
>> Similarly the subject I, cannot be defined. Only definition that one can
>> provide is the subject is that which cannot be objectified. It is a
>> negative definition, negating whatever can be objectified cannot be the
>> subject - neti neti says scripture.
>>
>> Hari Om!
>> Sadananda
>>
>> --------------------------------------------
>> On Sat, 6/27/15, Harsha Bhat via Advaita-l <
>> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>>
>>  Subject: [Advaita-l] Please Learned Scholars answer these doubts about
>> Advaitha Sidhanta..
>>  To: advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org
>>  Date: Saturday, June 27, 2015, 5:02 AM
>>
>>  Sir,
>>
>>            In advaitha Brahman is
>>  Termed as Nirguna....the
>>  same brahman is called as Nishkala,Nirvikaara,Shanta,Nithya
>>  Truptha,sat-chit-ananda....etc...
>>
>>  Here
>>  Nishkala meas indivisible,,,,
>>
>>  Nirvikaara meas never changing...
>>
>>  Nithya Truptha...means Self Satisfied..
>>
>>  Shantha,,,,Cool...
>>
>>  Nishkriya...without any activity...
>>
>>  Sat-chit-ananada....Every Happy....
>>
>>
>>  These are not Brahman's attribute???
>>
>>  If these are brahman's attribute definitely brahman is not
>>  brahman is
>>  nirguna...
>>
>>  And even we cannot say brahman as avarchaneeya...because we
>>  can call
>>  brahman by nirvikaara,shantha...sat-chit-ananda...etc...
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>>  http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>>
>>  To unsubscribe or change your options:
>>  http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>>
>>  For assistance, contact:
>>  listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>>
>>
>