[Advaita-l] akdhandaakara vRitti - My mistake

[Ravi Kiran]

On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 5:01 PM, श्रीमल्ललितालालितः <
lalitaalaalitah at lalitaalaalitah.com> wrote:

> If the akhaNDAkAra is by grace of self effulgent thing, then other
> examples will not be covered.
>
Why should one insist that other examples be covered under the same term by
defining akhaNDAkAra as niShprakAra ?

1) In all other examples, the vRtti is removing aGYAna ( both vRtti /
phala)

2) except when it is by the self-effulgent source, there is only vRtti
vyApti..

So, when both the cases are not similar, in the way ignorance is dispelled,
why cover them under same meaning of the term?

So, in that sense, if one says,  it is appropriate to limit the use of the
term akhaNDAkAra as BrahmakAra for brahmaGYAnam only ?





> You are repeating the mistakes made by all. You know what causes it.
>

> On Sat, Jul 4, 2015, 16:27 Ravi Kiran via Advaita-l <
> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>
>> If the subject is akhaNDa, the vRtti which illuminates/removes aGYAna of
>> it
>> > should be akhaNDAkAra.
>> >
>>
>> It gets its akhaNDAkAra because of the illumination by the self-effulgent
>> subject...
>>
>> In that sense, "vRtti removes aGYAna" is not fully correct, though it has
>> a
>> role to play, as vRtti vyApti
>> _______________________________________________
>> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>>
>> To unsubscribe or change your options:
>> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>>
>> For assistance, contact:
>> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>>
>