[Advaita-l] akdhandaakara vRitti - My mistake

[Ravi Kiran]

Alternately,

akhaNDAkArA-vRttiH or brahmAkAra-vRttiH should be niShprakArikA is ok and
acceptable..

(based on the definition given for niShprakAratva)

On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Ravi Kiran <ravikiranm108 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 5:01 PM, श्रीमल्ललितालालितः <
> lalitaalaalitah at lalitaalaalitah.com> wrote:
>
>> If the akhaNDAkAra is by grace of self effulgent thing, then other
>> examples will not be covered.
>>
> Why should one insist that other examples be covered under the same term
> by defining akhaNDAkAra as niShprakAra ?
>
> 1) In all other examples, the vRtti is removing aGYAna ( both vRtti /
> phala)
>
> 2) except when it is by the self-effulgent source, there is only vRtti
> vyApti..
>
> So, when both the cases are not similar, in the way ignorance is
> dispelled, why cover them under same meaning of the term?
>
> So, in that sense, if one says,  it is appropriate to limit the use of the
> term akhaNDAkAra as BrahmakAra for brahmaGYAnam only ?
>
>
>
>
>
>> You are repeating the mistakes made by all. You know what causes it.
>>
>
>> On Sat, Jul 4, 2015, 16:27 Ravi Kiran via Advaita-l <
>> advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:
>>
>>> If the subject is akhaNDa, the vRtti which illuminates/removes aGYAna of
>>> it
>>> > should be akhaNDAkAra.
>>> >
>>>
>>> It gets its akhaNDAkAra because of the illumination by the self-effulgent
>>> subject...
>>>
>>> In that sense, "vRtti removes aGYAna" is not fully correct, though it
>>> has a
>>> role to play, as vRtti vyApti
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
>>> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe or change your options:
>>> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>>>
>>> For assistance, contact:
>>> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>>>
>>
>