[Advaita-l] ***UNCHECKED*** Fwd: What is avidyA vR^itti as against antaHkaraNa vR^itti?
H S Chandramouli
hschandramouli at gmail.com
Tue Jul 28 01:51:35 CDT 2015
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 12:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] What is avidyA vR^itti as against antaHkaraNa
vR^itti?
To: H S Chandramouli <hschandramouli at gmail.com>
Chandramouli ji - PraNAms - you may be right. I am just pointing out the
facts reationally as we know. shaastra-yuki and anubhava should be the
basis for analysis and anubhava evolves as we have universal observations
that need to be accounted. What I mentioned (not the attributive knowledge)
was somewhat discussed in Vichara Sagara of Nischaladaasa which we are
studying under Swami Paramarthanandaji - and the current topic is pramaaNa
analysis.
Hari Om!
Sadananda
--------------------------------------------
On Tue, 7/28/15, H S Chandramouli <hschandramouli at gmail.com> wrote:
Subject: Re: [Advaita-l] What is avidyA vR^itti as against antaHkaraNa
vR^itti?
To: "kuntimaddi sadananda" <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com>
Date: Tuesday, July 28, 2015, 2:12 AM
Sri
Sadananda Ji,
Basically the
discussion so far pertained to what is presented in Vedanta
Paribhasha and Advaita Sidhi. Very different from what you
have considered here. I may be wrong.
Pranams and Regards
Chandramouli
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at
10:15 AM, kuntimaddi sadananda <kuntimaddisada at yahoo.com>
wrote:
PraNAms
Just for some thought, but not to confuse.
There are several aspects involved - pramaa vs bhramaa,
smRiti and perception, and whether smRiti comes under
separate pramaana. Anandaji also brought in - the internal
perceptions - such as emotions- anger, happiness, or certain
moods of the mind.
Looking from a rational point - The perception for the first
time (I think V. Advaita - classifies as indeterminate - not
sure about tarkikaas) there is no role of smRiti. and no
jaati also here. When a child sees a cow for the first time,
a white cow, and mother says - my dear this is a cow- now
the cognition of cow and knowledge of the cognition as cow,
as supported by aapta vaakya follows - otherwise just
cognition of an object without a name. Here pramaa and
pramaata are involved at antaHkarana level. From my point,
all cognitions are attributive in the sense that senses can
only gather (reflective) attributes of the object perceived
since original attributes are inseparable from their locus -
and vishaya - the cow remains fortunately outside!
The first cognition forms a memory sometimes being referred
to as samskaara or vaasaana, hence part of kaaraNa shareera
- this may be called as avidyaa vRitti.
When the child sees another cow which is black, and the
mother says this is also cow, - cognition, recognition as
well as instincts of jaati are coming into play.
Hence even in perception for the second time on - smRiti is
coming into picture in recognition part. Hence perception
involves both cognition and recognition to some extent or
memory is playing a role in the knowledge. Hence avidhyaa
vRitti or vaasana samskaara coming in the recognition
process and not a cognitive level.Hence we have both
antaHkarana vRitti and avidyaa vRitti due to vaasanaas or
samskaara or memory.
In the sRiti alone without cognition - as someone
remembering a cow - then there is no cognition but only
internal perception - if we call this as perception.
Bhranti comes when the cognition is incomplete (since
cognition is mostly attributive and attributives are
incomplete due to absence of required secondary conditions
such as light etc) and smRitti say snake while seeing a
rope.
smRiti is some have classified as antaHkarana vRitti while
some others as avidya or kaarNa shareera vRitit.
With jaati only the general attribute say cowness of the cow
comes into picture - this happens only after second perhaps
reinforced cognition-recognition cycle.
Hari Om!
Sadananda
--------------------------------------------
On Mon, 7/27/15, H S Chandramouli via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
wrote:
Subject: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: [Advaita-l] What is avidyA
vR^itti as against antaHkaraNa vR^itti?
To: "Anand Hudli" <anandhudli at hotmail.com>,
"A discussion group for Advaita Vedanta" <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
Date: Monday, July 27, 2015, 11:32 PM
Dear Sri Anand Ji,
Is not sopadika bhranti (
सोपाधिक भ्रान्ति )
considered
avidya vritti ,
even though it can be
classified as objective knowledge ? Please clarify.
Regards and Pranams
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:10
PM, Anand Hudli via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org>
wrote:
> An attempt to
answer some questions.
> The difference
between objective knowledge and subjective knowledge
lies
in
> the capability of the former type of
knowledge to be *directly*
>
(aparokSheNa) conveyed or used in dealings (vyavahAra)
with
people other
> than the person who has
this knowledge. For example, if you see a pot, you
> may point it out to others, "this is
a pot", and they too will have the
>
same direct perception of the pot. On the other hand, if
you
feel happy,
> you cannot *directly*
convey this feeling to me. There is no way for me to
> *directly* feel what you are feeling. You
may express your feeling with
> some act,
words, etc. that allows me to understand your feeling,
but
this
> only gives me an *indirect*
knowledge. Coming to illusions such as a
> silver-nacre, the advaitasiddhi holds that
two cognitions are involved
> here. In
the (erroneous) cognition, "this is silver",
the
"this" (idam)
> part is
objective, but the "silver" (rajatam) part is
subjective. Why? When
> a person seeing
illusory silver says, "this is silver",
another
person in
> the vicinity will certainly
see some object as the first person did, but
> he/she may not see the object as silver.
It is possible the second person
> is not
affected by the illusion, and may, in fact, see the
nacre,
not
> silver. So the agreement between
the first person and the second person is
> that there is "something" out
there. The knowledge of "something" is
> objective and is common to both persons.
However, the knowledge of "silver"
> is restricted to the first person who is
affected by the illusion. The
> second
person may have the knowledge of nacre, not silver. This
is
why it
> is said avidyAvRtti can be
prAtibhAsika or vyAvahArika.
> If we look
"under the hood" and try to understand what
is
anataHkaraNa
> vRtti and what is
avidyAvRtti, it is important to note that objective
> knowledge, called "pramA", is
gained through a pramANa (means of knowledge,
> such as perception, inference, scriptures,
etc), while subjective
> knowledge,
including the prAtibhAsika type, is not so obtained. In
the
case
> of subjective knowledge, the
witness-consciousness (sAkShicaitanya)
>
cognizes it without the need for antaHkaraNavRtti. In
contrast, objective
> knowledge gained
through a pramANa results in the modification of the
> antaHkaraNa (mind), called
antaHkaraNavRtti. MahamahopAdhyAya Abhyankar has
> remarked in his commentary on the
siddhAntabindu (dashashlokI):
>
apramAjnAnaM na manovRttirUpaM kiMtu avidyAvRttirUpaM
sAkShyAshrayam.
>
>
> Anand
>
_______________________________________________
> Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
> http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
>
> To unsubscribe or
change your options:
> http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
>
> For assistance,
contact:
> listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
>
_______________________________________________
Archives: http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.culture.religion.advaita
To unsubscribe or change your
options:
http://lists.advaita-vedanta.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/advaita-l
For assistance, contact:
listmaster at advaita-vedanta.org
More information about the Advaita-l mailing list