[Advaita-l] dva suparNA

[Jaldhar H. Vyas]

On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, Venkatraghavan S via Advaita-l wrote:

> Because the second bird does not have kartritva/bhoktritva and from
> AchArya's use of chaitanyamAtram in describing Brahma svabhAva, it's
> probably reasonable to conclude he is referring to nirguNa brahman?
>

Well I was going to post a longer reply but Shri Chandramouli has beaten 
my to it.  I just want to concur that the second bird is not nirguNa 
brahman in the munDakopaniShad context because both birds are in the 
"samAna vR^ikSha" i.e. the sharIra.

-- 
Jaldhar H. Vyas <jaldhar at braincells.com>