[Advaita-l] dva suparNA

[Venkatraghavan S]

On 13 Nov 2015 07:41, "Jaldhar H. Vyas via Advaita-l" <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

I just want to concur that the second bird is not nirguNa brahman in the
munDakopaniShad context because both birds are in the "samAna vR^ikSha"
i.e. the sharIra.


Sri Jaldhar,
I have no problems if you prefer to call the second bird as sAkshi instead,
but sAkshi is nirguNa brahman, so I don't agree with your statement saying
it is not nirguNa brahman.

The lakshyArtha of tat and tvam have to be the same.

Regards,
Venkatraghavan