[Advaita-l] [advaitin] Why only jagat is mithya and jeeva is brahman !!??

[Praveen R. Bhat]

Namaste Bhaskarji,

Its interesting to see you choosing to take cheap shots at others,
especially on a mail where your patience has been appreciated! :) Since I
am the only one I see in this thread who has "thanked the (TIkAkAra and)
teachers" for clarity in teaching, I am forced to respond. By no stretch of
imagination does it mean that I called you an asamprAdAyavit, let alone an
idiot! I don't know where you get these ideas, but I am sorry it is not "a
personal attack" by me and if you think so, I wouldn't call it mental
harmony. :)

In any case, I am glad to see that (you say) you are open to correction on
jagat satyatvam. And yes, I have concluded beyond doubt on the issue. I
don't have reservations in saying that, for aforesaid reason, and nor do I
claim any different just for the sake of it.

Be that as it may, I regret causing you offence, although completely
unintentional. Inasmuch, I'll refrain from having discussions with you
further, so that I don't disturb your mental harmony and that of the list.
:) Thanks for your involving me thus far.

praNam,
--praveen

On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Bhaskar YR via Advaita-l <
advaita-l at lists.advaita-vedanta.org> wrote:

> Why I don’t lose my temper is because unlike others (who are already
> settled in their viewpoints thanking their teachers / saMpradAya etc. for
> imparting the 'correct' teaching etc. and picking the others from that
> already 'settled' siddhanta etc. :-)

I don’t have any settled views on this topic.  I am just neutrally
> analyzing these issues with the help of bhAshya pAtha and shrutyukta
> mantra-s.  Yes, from my stickiness to this topic it may sound that jagat
> satyatva is  a settled issue in my books of vedAnta but that is not the
> case.  You can find my thoughts on jagan mithyatva (with same degree of
> intensity), ashareeratvaM of jnAni as well   in the pUrNamidaM & jnAni's
> BMI discussion in advaitin group .  So, unlike others I am not prejudiced
> in this subject and trying to analyze it from all the possible angles which
> are in line with shruti, yukti and anubhava.  Since there is nothing like
> subjective passionate involvement from my side in this topic, despite
> numerous personal attacks and socalled 'logical' pickings, labelling me
> asaMpradAyik idiot etc.   I could still maintain my mental harmony :-) And
> when I feel tired, happily I would rest my case without much ado :-)
>
>